不同类型的资源构建对双元能力形成的影响研究
The Effect of Different Types of Resource Structure on Ambidextrous Innovation Capabilities
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2013.31006, PDF, HTML, 下载: 3,061  浏览: 10,152  科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨 东*：西安电子经济管理学院，西安
关键词: 双元；资源构建；组织能力；Ambidexterity; Resource Structure; Capabilities
摘要: 动态环境下，企业关注的焦点由静态的资源转移到动态的资源管理。综合双元组织理论、资源管理理论，研究了资源构建与双元能力之间的关系。基于理论分析，提出了有形资源构建可以促进应用能力提高，而与探索能力是倒“U”型关系；无形资源构建可以促进探索能力和应用能力的提高的相关假设。
Abstract: This paper builds a framework of structuring resources and capabilities. The theoretic analysis indi-cates that the relationship between intangible resource bundling and the exploitation (exploration) capabilities is positive, whereas effect of tangible resource bundling on the exploration capabilities is inverted U-shape.
文章引用：杨东. 不同类型的资源构建对双元能力形成的影响研究[J]. 现代管理, 2013, 3(1): 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/MM.2013.31006

参考文献

[1] D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 2003, 27(4): 339-358.
[2] D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt and R. D. Ireland. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292.
[3] J. B. Barney, A. M. Arikan. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, 2001: 124-188.
[4] D. A. Levinthal, J. G. March. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(8): 95-112.
[5] J. G. March. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
[6] 张玉利, 李乾文. 公司创业导向、双元能力与组织绩效[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009, 12(1): 137-152.
[7] K. Atuahene-Gima. Resolving the capability rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4): 61- 83.
[8] K. Atuahene-Gima, J. Y. Murray. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(2): 1-29.
[9] M. Li, F. Gao. Why nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2003, 7(4): 6-14.
[10] S. Karim, W. Mitchell. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following business. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1061.
[11] Y. Caloghirou, I. Kastelli and A. Tsakanikas. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 2004, 24(1): 29-39.
[12] P. Mihir. Knowledge management framework for high-tech research and development. Engineering Management Journal, 2001, 13(3): 27-33.
[13] M. Tripsas. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial & Corporate Change, 1997, 6(2): 341-377.
[14] F. T. Rothaermel, D. L. Deeds. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(3): 201-221.
[15] M. Zollo, S. G. Winter. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3): 339- 351.

为你推荐