健康权视野下中国三高食品法律规制研究
Research on the Legal Regulation of Three-High Food in China from the Perspective of Health Rights
摘要: 随着高糖、高脂、高盐食品(“三高食品”)的广泛消费,相关慢性疾病风险不断上升,对公众健康权造成持续影响。现行食品安全法律制度在营养标识、广告规制及风险干预等方面仍存在不足,难以有效回应健康权保护的现实需求。以健康权为分析视角,在梳理我国三高食品法律规制现状的基础上,结合英国、新加坡等国家的制度经验,分析我国三高食品规制在干预强度与规制方式上的主要问题,并提出通过强化营养标签、规范食品营销行为及完善综合干预机制来优化相关法律规制的路径建议。
Abstract: Consumption of high-sugar, high-fat, high-salt (“three-highs”) foods raises chronic disease risks, harming the right to health. China’s food safety laws lack adequate nutrition labeling, advertising regulation, and risk intervention. From the right-to-health perspective, this paper examines China’s three-highs food regulation, draws on UK and Singapore experiences, analyzes intervention problems, and proposes optimization via stronger labeling, marketing controls, and comprehensive interventions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
武亦文. 健康权的规范内涵与法治保障[J]. 中国社会科学, 2025(11): 88-107+206.
|
|
[2]
|
约翰∙密尔. 论自由[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015: 247.
|
|
[3]
|
邹超. 新时代食品安全法律制度及反思[J]. 食品与机械, 2025, 41(1): 254.
|
|
[4]
|
教育部联合国家卫生健康委等四部门印发《营养与健康学校建设指南》[J]. 食品与健康, 2021(8): 4.
|
|
[5]
|
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 7, Part 210, 11 (Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-7/subtitle-B/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-210
|
|
[6]
|
美国农业部SSIS标准[Z/OL]. 美国农业部官网. https://www.fns.usda.gov/tn/guide-smart-snacks-school, 2026-02-13.
|
|
[7]
|
减糖进度报告(2015-2019) [Z/OL]. 英国政府官网. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sugar-reduction-report-on-progress-between-2015-and-2019, 2026-02-13.
|
|
[8]
|
针对儿童的食品和饮料电视广告——新限制措施的选择方案[Z/OL]. 英国通信管理局官网. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/foodads, 2026-02-13.
|
|
[9]
|
新加坡《食品法规》第四部分第184条[Z/OL]. 新加坡法律在线网站. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/283-RG1?DocDate=20230630&ProvIds=P1IV-#top, 2026-02-13.
|
|
[10]
|
杨登峰. 从合理原则走向统一的比例原则[J]. 中国法学, 2016(3): 88-105.
|
|
[11]
|
胡炜宸, 余德厚. 危害食品安全刑法规制的缺陷及其完善路径[J]. 食品与机械, 2025, 41(11): 41-44.
|