ESG框架下公司社会责任的法治化路径研究
Research on the Legalization Path of Corporate Social Responsibility under the ESG Framework
摘要: 近年来,ESG理念引起国际社会的广泛关注,ESG作为兼具分析、评价与指引功能的工具,为企业社会责任的落地提供了系统性框架,要求企业在追求经济效益的同时,积极履行对环境、社会和利益相关者的治理责任。我国公司法早已确立公司社会责任要求,且呈现出进一步明确化、法律化的立法趋势,但在法治化过程中仍存在社会责任条款可操作性不足、实施监督机制缺失、信息披露不透明等问题,同时ESG评级不透明、E、S、G三者在本土情境下的关联与矛盾也成为法治化推进的新痛点。本文以ESG为核心分析工具,剖析E、S、G在中国情境下的内在逻辑与现实冲突,探讨法律对ESG评级问题的回应路径,进而提出ESG框架下公司社会责任法治化的具体策略,以期为我国公司社会责任的法治化实践提供理论参考。
Abstract: In recent years, the ESG concept has attracted widespread attention from the international community. As an integrated tool with analytical, evaluative and guiding functions, ESG provides a systematic framework for the implementation of corporate social responsibility, requiring enterprises to actively fulfill their governance responsibilities to the environment, society and stakeholders while pursuing economic benefits. China’s Company Law has long-established requirements for corporate social responsibility, and there has been a legislative trend of further clarifying and legalizing such requirements. However, in the process of legalization, problems remain such as the lack of operability of corporate social responsibility clauses, the absence of implementation and supervision mechanisms, and opaque information disclosure. Meanwhile, the opacity of ESG ratings and the inherent connections and contradictions among Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) dimensions in the Chinese context have become new pain points in advancing the legalization drive. Taking ESG as the core analytical tool, this paper analyzes the internal logic and practical conflicts of E, S and G in the Chinese context, explores the legal response paths to the problems of ESG ratings, and further puts forward specific strategies for the legalization of corporate social responsibility under the ESG framework, aiming to provide theoretical references for the practice of legalizing corporate social responsibility in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
[美]霍华德·R·鲍恩. 商人的社会责任[M]. 肖红军, 等, 译. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2015.
|
|
[2]
|
Blair, M.M. and Stout, L.A. (1999) A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review, 85, 247-328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
李淑英. 企业社会责任: 概念界定、范围及特质[J]. 哲学动态, 2007(4): 41-46.
|
|
[4]
|
曹凤月. 企业社会责任的范围[J]. 工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报), 2004(2): 83-84.
|
|
[5]
|
哈罗德·孔茨, 海因茨·韦里克. 管理学[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2003: 44.
|
|
[6]
|
吴维锭. 公司法上社会责任条款司法化的逻辑与再塑[J]. 法学研究, 2024, 46(3): 113-129.
|
|
[7]
|
史际春, 肖竹, 冯辉. 论公司社会责任: 法律义务、道德责任及其他[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(2): 48-55.
|
|
[8]
|
郑志军. 我国公司社会责任法治化的缺陷及完善路径[J]. 安阳工学院学报, 2013, 12(5): 13-15.
|
|
[9]
|
冉克平, 曹蔚轩. 国有企业社会责任治理的独立规制及原则建构[J]. 兰州学刊, 2024(5): 1-16.
|
|
[10]
|
王琦. 论我国公司社会责任承担体系的有效建构[J]. 中国集体经济, 2019(3): 116-117.
|