[1]
|
任俊, 李瑞雪, 詹鋆, 刘迪, 林曼, 彭年强(2014). 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释——基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据. 心理学报, 46(6), 841-851
|
[2]
|
王珍珍, 蒋文明(2016). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自行为的证据. 心理与行为研究, 14(5), 600-604, 646.
|
[3]
|
吴燕, 周晓林(2012). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44(6), 797-806.
|
[4]
|
张振, 刘凯, 杨邵峰(2013). 非理性决策中的情绪加工及其影响因素——以最后通牒任务为例. 唐山师范学院学报, (1), 155-158.
|
[5]
|
张振(2013). 群体身份影响公平加工的行为与脑电研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
|
[6]
|
Addae, H. M., & Boso, N. (2020). Job Satisfaction, Distributive Justice, Perceived Absence Legitimacy and the Role of Turnover Intentions: An Exploratory Study in Ghana. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29, 801-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-11-2019-1940
|
[7]
|
Boksem, M. A. S., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness Concerns Predict Medial Frontal Negativity Amplitude in Ultimatum Bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5, 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910903202666
|
[8]
|
Brüne, M., Tas, C., Wischniewski, J., Welpinghus, A., Heinisch, C., & Newen, A. (2012). Hypnotic Ingroup-Outgroup Suggestion Influences Economic Decision-Making in an Ultimatum Game. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 939-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.009
|
[9]
|
Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal Specificity Effects on Hypothesis Testing in Problem Solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55, 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000262
|
[10]
|
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.
|
[11]
|
Castillo, J. C., Palacios, D., Joignant, A., & Tham, M. (2015). Inequality, Distributive Justice and Political Participation: An Analysis of the Case of Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34, 486-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12369
|
[12]
|
Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Lieberman, M. D., Tabibnia, G., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Impulsive Choice and Altruistic Punishment Are Correlated and Increase in Tandem with Serotonin Depletion. Emotion, 10, 855-862. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019861
|
[13]
|
Deng, L., Li, Q., Zhang, M., Shi, P., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Distinct Neural Dynamics Underlying Risk and Ambiguity during Valued‐based Decision Making. Psychophysiology, 60, e14201. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14201
|
[14]
|
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A Theory of Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
|
[15]
|
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
|
[16]
|
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in Young Children. Nature, 454, 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155
|
[17]
|
Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Fairness Considerations: Increasing Understanding of Intentionality during Adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 398-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.07.002
|
[18]
|
Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Unfair? It Depends: Neural Correlates of Fairness in Social Context. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 414-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq013
|
[19]
|
Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Dissociable Brain Networks Involved in Development of Fairness Considerations: Understanding Intentionality behind Unfairness. NeuroImage, 57, 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.032
|
[20]
|
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
|
[21]
|
Jiao, J., & Zhao, J. (2023). Individualism, Collectivism, and Allocation Behavior: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 169-189. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020169
|
[22]
|
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2007). Studying the Neurobiology of Social Interaction with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation—The Example of Punishing Unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1987-1990. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm237
|
[23]
|
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex. Science, 314, 829-832. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129156
|
[24]
|
Liu, S., Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2021). Social Distance Modulates Outcome Processing When Comparing Abilities with Others. Psychophysiology, 58, e13798. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13798
|
[25]
|
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N., & Warneken, F. (2017). The Developmental Foundations of Human Fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article No. 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0042
|
[26]
|
Radke, S., Güroğlu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2012). There’s Something about a Fair Split: Intentionality Moderates Context-Based Fairness Considerations in Social Decision-Making. PLOS ONE, 7, e31491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031491
|
[27]
|
Sally, D., & Hill, E. (2006). The Development of Interpersonal Strategy: Autism, Theory-of-Mind, Cooperation and Fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015
|
[28]
|
Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M. et al. (2012). Rejection of Unfair Offers in the Ultimatum Game Is No Evidence of Strong Reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 20364-20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109
|
[29]
|
Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. S. (2009). The Private Rejection of Unfair Offers and Emotional Commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11520-11523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900636106
|
[30]
|
Zhang, S., & Zhou, J. (2018). Social Justice and Public Cooperation Intention: Mediating Role of Political Trust and Moderating Effect of Outcome Dependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 382465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01381
|