“醉酒取财”行为适用抢劫罪之问题研究
Study on the Applicability of “Drunken Taking of Money” to Robbery
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.134347, PDF, 下载: 66  浏览: 131 
作者: 顾佳宁:华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海
关键词: 醉酒取财抢劫罪主动醉酒被动醉酒Drunken Taking of Money Crime of Robbery Active Drunkenness Passive Drunkenness
摘要: 根据通说观点,“醉酒取财”行为符合抢劫罪中“其他方法”的行为模式,应以抢劫罪定罪处罚,实务中此类案件也多以抢劫罪判决。但是,“醉酒”与“暴力、胁迫”并列共同作为抢劫罪的手段行为,其至少应当对被害人的人身法益具有侵犯的可能性,将一切“醉酒取财”的行为均认定为抢劫罪并不合理。实践中出现的“醉酒取财”行为大致可分为三类:一是以平和手段劝人饮酒后取财,二是将人强行灌醉后取财,三是以欺骗方式让人醉酒后取财,根据上述分类,应视行为人具体手段的不同判断其是否构成抢劫罪。
Abstract: According to the general view, the behavior of “drunken taking of money” conforms to the behavior pattern of “other methods” in the crime of robbery, and should be convicted and punished by the crime of robbery. However, “drunkenness” and “violence or coercion” as means of robbery, at least should have the possibility of infringement on the victim’s personal legal interests. All “drunken taking of money” behaviors are considered as robbery is not reasonable. In practice, the behaviors of “drunken taking of money” can be roughly divided into three categories: One is to persuade people to get money after drinking alcohol by peaceful means. The second is to forcibly get money after getting drunk, and the third is to get money after cheating. According to the above classification, the perpetrator shall be judged to the crime of robbery depending on the specific means used.
文章引用:顾佳宁. “醉酒取财”行为适用抢劫罪之问题研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(4): 650-656. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.134347

参考文献

[1] 高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 第9版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019: 492.
[2] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019: 973.
[3] 刘明祥. 财产罪专论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 43.
[4] 冯亚东, 刘凤科. 论抢劫罪客体要件之意义[J]. 华东政法学院学报, 2003(2): 22-28.
[5] 赵秉志. 侵犯财产罪[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2003: 63.
[6] 王皇玉. 刑法总则[M]. 台湾: 台北新学林出版股份有限公司, 2020: 24.
[7] 王明辉. 复行为犯研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2008: 195.
[8] 周光权. 刑事司法改革需秉持刑法客观主义[J]. 人民检察, 2022(18): 31.
[9] 张军. 刑法[分则]及配套规定新释新解(上) [M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2013(3): 879.
[10] 向燕. 醉酒类强奸案件的司法认定: 在不确定性中寻求真实[J]. 法学家, 2023(6): 87-102.