阅读知觉广度研究现状与未来展望

期刊菜单

阅读知觉广度研究现状与未来展望
Current Status and Future Prospects of Reading Perceptual Breadth Research

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1312759, PDF, 下载: 240 浏览: 371 科研立项经费支持
作者: 潘国庆：内蒙古师范大学心理学院，内蒙古呼和浩特
关键词: 阅读；知觉广度；眼动；Reading； Perceptual Breadth； Eye Movements

摘要: 阅读知觉广度指的是读者从一次注视中获得有效信息的范围大小，对于阅读能力的培养至关重要。本文述评了关于测量阅读知觉广度的实验范式：移动窗口范式与移动掩蔽范式及其实验逻辑，当前拼音文字与汉语阅读知觉广度的研究进展以及影响阅读知觉广度大小的因素，最后对未来国内阅读知觉广度研究进行展望与建议。

Abstract: Reading perceptual breadth refers to the extent of effective information that readers obtain from a single gaze, and is crucial for the development of reading ability. This paper reviews the experimental paradigms for measuring reading perceptual breadth: the moving window paradigm and the moving mask paradigm and their experimental logics, the progress of the current research on reading perceptual breadth in pinyin and Chinese, and the factors affecting the size of reading perceptual breadth, and finally, it gives an outlook and suggestions for the future research on reading perceptual breadth in China.

文章引用：潘国庆 (2023). 阅读知觉广度研究现状与未来展望. 心理学进展, 13(12), 5976-5984. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1312759

参考文献

[1]	白学军, 高晓雷, 高蕾, 王永胜(2017). 藏语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理学报, 49(5), 569-576.
[2]	伏干, 闫国利(2008). 高中二年级学生双字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 6(4), 285-290.
[3]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾(2021). 高、低汉语水平藏——汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应. 心理与行为研究,19 (3), 297-303+333.
[4]	关善玲, 闫国利(2007). 移动窗口条件下不同工作记忆者阅读差异的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 5(4), 309-313.
[5]	李赛男(2018). 小学2-5年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度发展的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[6]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍(2021). 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 19(5), 606-611.
[7]	李韵静, 张红葵, 白柳, 王越, 程小云, 范宏玮, 闫国利(2015). 小学五年级学生英语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 13(2), 225-229+236.
[8]	仝文, 刘妮娜, 伏干, 闫国利(2014). 中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度. 心理与行为研究, 12(3), 298-303.
[9]	王丽红, 白学军, 闫国利(2014). 汉语阅读知觉广度的老化: 一项眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 12(6), 763-768.
[10]	王丽红, 石凤妍, 吴捷, 白学军(2010). 老年人汉语阅读时知觉广度的眼动变化. 中国老年学杂志, 30(2), 240-243.
[11]	王丽红, 闫国利(2020). 阅读知觉广度研究中掩蔽刺激干扰效应的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 40(4), 318-324.
[12]	王丽红, 闫国利(2021). 汉语双字词句知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 41(2), 123-130.
[13]	王亚丽(2020). 1-5年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[14]	吴捷, 张兰兰, 巫金根(2010). 高中生英语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 30(2), 29-34.
[15]	熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军(2007). 高中二年级学生中文阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 5(1), 60-64+80.
[16]	熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军(2009). 不同年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 32(3), 584-587.
[17]	闫国利, 伏干, 白学军(2008). 不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31(6), 1287-1290.
[18]	闫国利, 李赛男, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 王丽红(2018). 小学二年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 41(4), 849-855.
[19]	闫国利, 宋子明(2023). 阅读心理学视角下的“一目十行”现象. 心理研究, 16(3), 216-223.
[20]	闫国利, 孙莎莎, 张巧明, 白学军(2014). 自然阅读与校对阅读的知觉广度研究. 心理科学, 37(2), 298-302. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.02.010
[21]	闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军(2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43(3), 249-263.
[22]	闫国利, 王影超, 刘璐, 兰泽波, 李赛男, 宋子明(2021). 中学聋生阅读中的副中央凹注意增强特点: 来自阅读知觉广度的证据. 心理科学, 44(4), 807-814.
[23]	闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯, 白学军(2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1966-1976.
[24]	闫国利, 巫金根, 王丽红(2013). 小学五年级语文学优生与学困生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 36(3), 622-626.
[25]	闫国利, 熊建萍, 白学军(2008). 小学五年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 72-77.
[26]	闫国利, 张兰兰, 郎瑞, 白学军(2008). 大学生英语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理研究, 13(2), 80-85.
[27]	臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利(2013). 副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 11(4), 444-450.
[28]	张巧明(2014). 小学生阅读知觉广度与速度的发展: 来自眼动的证据. 博士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[29]	张玉晶, 买合甫来提∙坎吉, 阻木然提古丽∙然木吐拉(2015). 不同水平五年级维吾尔族学生母语阅读知觉广度. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 703-709.
[30]	DeDe, G. (2020). Perceptual Span in Individuals with Aphasia. Aphasiology, 34, 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1591612
[31]	Findelsberger, E., Hutzler, F., & Hawelka, S. (2019). Spill the Load: Mixed Evidence for a Foveal Load Effect, Reliable Evidence for a Spillover Effect in Eye-Movement Control during Reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81, 1442-1453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01689-5
[32]	He, L., Ma, W., Shen, F., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Warrington, K. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2021). Adult Age Differences in Parafoveal Preview Effects during Reading: Evidence from Chinese. Psychology and Aging, 36, 822-833. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000639
[33]	Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The Perceptual Span and Oculomotor Activity during the Reading of Chinese Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
[34]	Justino, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2023). Eye Movements during Reading in Beginning and Skilled Readers: Impact of Reading Level or Physiological Maturation? Acta Psychologica, 236, Article ID: 103927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103927
[35]	Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Task Effects on Eye Movements during Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1561-1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020693
[36]	Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of Parafoveal Preview Benefit in High and Low Working Memory Capacity Readers: Implications for Eye Movement Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.68
[37]	Kim, Y. G., Little, C., Petscher, Y., & Vorstius, C. (2022). Developmental Trajectories of Eye Movements in Oral and Silent Reading for Beginning Readers: A Longitudinal Investigation. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 18708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23420-5
[38]	Ktistakis, E., Gleni, A., Tsilimbaris, M. K., & Plainis, S. (2023). Comparing Silent Reading Performance for Single Sentences and Paragraphs: An Eye Movement-Based Analysis. Clinical & Experimental Optometry. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2023.2237974
[39]	Liu, W., Angele, B., Luo, C., & Li, X. (2018). Beyond the Leftward Limit of the Perceptual Span: Parafoveal Processing to the Left of Fixation in Chinese Reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 1873-1878. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1599-3
[40]	Loberg, O., Hautala, J., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2019). Influence of Reading Skill and Word Length on Fixation-Related Brain Activity in School-Aged Children during Natural Reading. Vision Research, 165, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.07.008
[41]	Lyu, A., Abel, L., & Cheong, A. M. Y. (2023). Effect of Habitual Reading Direction on Saccadic Eye Movements: A Pilot Study. PLOS ONE, 18, e0286801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286801
[42]	Mcconkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The Span of the Effective Stimulus during a Fixation in Reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203972
[43]	Meixner, J. M., Nixon, J. S., & Laubrock, J. (2022). The Perceptual Span Is Dynamically Adjusted in Response to Foveal Load by Beginning Readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 151, 1219-1232. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001140
[44]	Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language Independent Working Memory as Measured by Japanese and English Reading Span Test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287-289. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330466
[45]	Osaka, N., & Osaka, M. (2002). Individual Differences in Working Memory during Reading with and without Parafoveal Information: A Moving-Window Study. The American Journal of Psychology, 115, 501-513. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423525
[46]	Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the Perceptual Span for Israeli Readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(81)90073-0
[47]	Rayner, K. (1986). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Beginning and Skilled Readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90037-8
[48]	Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a Fovea. Science, 206, 468-469. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.504987
[49]	Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Older and Younger Readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014300
[50]	Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The Availability of Useful Information to the Right of Fixation in Reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537-550. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204186
[51]	Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The Zoom Lens of Attention: Simulating Shuffled versus Normal Text Reading Using the SWIFT Model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.670143
[52]	Sperlich, A., Meixner, J., & Laubrock, J. (2016). Development of the Perceptual Span in Reading: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.007
[53]	Strandberg, A., Nilsson, M., Östberg, P., & Öqvist Seimyr, G. (2022). Eye Movements during Reading and Their Relationship to Reading Assessment Outcomes in Swedish Elementary School Children. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.4.3
[54]	Su, J., Yin, G., Bai, X., Yan, G., Kurtev, S., Warrington, K. L., McGowan, V. A., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2020). Flexibility in the Perceptual Span during Reading: Evidence from Mongolian. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 1566-1572. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01960-9
[55]	Wang, A., Yan, M., Wang, B., Jia, G., & Inhoff, A. W. (2021). The Perceptual Span in Tibetan Reading. Psychological Research, 85, 1307-1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01313-4
[56]	Wertli, J., Schötzau, A., & Palmowski-Wolfe, A. (2023). The Influence of Age on Eye Movements during Reading in Early Elementary School Children. Untersuchung der Augenbewegungen bei Kindern im frühen Grundschulalter während des Lesens. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, 240, 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2045-7271
[57]	Xie, F., McGowan, V. A., Chang, M., Li, L., White, S. J., Paterson, K. B., Wang, J., & Warrington, K. L. (2020a). Revealing Similarities in the Perceptual Span of Young and Older Chinese Readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1189-1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819899826
[58]	Xie, F., Wang, J., Hao, L., Zhang, X., & Warrington, K. L. (2020b). Perceptual Span Is Independent of Font Size for Older and Young Readers: Evidence from Chinese. Psychology and Aging, 35, 1026-1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000549
[59]	Yan, M., Li, H., Su, Y., Cao, Y., & Pan, J. (2020). The Perceptual Span and Individual Differences among Chinese Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24, 520-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1713789
[60]	Yan, M., Pan, J., & Kliegl, R. (2019). Eye Movement Control in Chinese Reading: A Cross-Sectional Study. Developmental Psychology, 55, 2275-2285. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000819
[61]	Zhang, J., Warrington, K. L., Li, L., Pagán, A., Paterson, K. B., White, S. J., & McGowan, V. A. (2022). Are Older Adults More Risky Readers? Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Psychology and Aging, 37, 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000522
[62]	Zhao, S., Li, L., Chang, M., Wang, J., & Paterson, K. B. (2021). A Further Look at Ageing and Word Predictability Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence from One-Character Words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820951131
[63]	Zhou, W., Wang, A., & Yan, M. (2021). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span among Skilled Uighur Readers. Vision Research, 182, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.005

为你推荐

友情链接