[1]
|
Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
|
[2]
|
Ädel, A. (2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1-255.
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24
|
[3]
|
陈艳平, 潘璐霖. 汉韩学术论文摘要中元话语劝说功能对比研究[J]. 东疆学刊, 2020, 38(2): 106-112.
|
[4]
|
Iman, R. (2011) Involving the Reader in the Text: Engagement Markers in Native and Non-Native Student Argumentative Essays.
|
[5]
|
Zarei, G.R. and Mansoori, S. (2007) Metadiscourse in Academic Prose: A Contrastive Analysis of English and Persian Research Articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 3, 24-40.
|
[6]
|
Hyland, K. (2010) Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science. Journal of English for Aca-demic Purposes, 9, 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
|
[7]
|
Zou, H. and Hyland, K. (2019) Re-working Research: Interactions in Academic Articles and Blogs. Discourse Studies, 21, 713-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619866983
|
[8]
|
Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1-317.
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54
|
[9]
|
Hyland, K. (1999) Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
|
[10]
|
Hyland, K. (1999) Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
|
[11]
|
Hyland, K. (2004) Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
|
[12]
|
Hyland, K. (2005) Representing Readers in Writing: Student and Expert Practices. Linguistics and Education, 16, 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002
|
[13]
|
周雅. 关于二语学术写作中的介入标记语的比较性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2012.
|
[14]
|
娄宝翠, 王亚丽. 学习者英语学术写作介入标记语使用特征[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(4): 58.
|
[15]
|
许瑾, 林立惜. 中英文刊物科技论文的语篇体裁对比——以高影响因子生物医学刊物为例[J]. 科技与出版, 2011(9): 91-94.
|
[16]
|
Guziurová, T. (2017) The Role of Metadiscourse in Genre Analysis: Engagement Markers in Undergraduate Textbooks and Research Articles. In: Aijmer, K. and Lewis, D., Eds., Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-Pragmatic As-pects of Linguistic Genres, Springer, Berlin, 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_10
|
[17]
|
曹润慧. 交往行为理论视角下英语公益广告中介入标记语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2019.
|
[18]
|
Qiu, X. and Jiang, F. (2021) Stance and Engagement in 3 MT Presentations: How Students Communicate Disciplinary Knowledge to a Wide Audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, Article ID: 100976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100976
|
[19]
|
Farghal, M. and Kalakh, B. (2019) Engagement in Translation: In-teractional Metadiscourse Markers in American Presidential Debates. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Litera-tures, 12, 103-122.
https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.12.1.7
|
[20]
|
滕达. 奥巴马就职演讲中互动元话语的对话性分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2014(3): 114-116.
|
[21]
|
Leonardo, R. (2005) Interpersonal Engagement in Academic Spo-ken Discourse: A Functional Account of Dissertation Defenses. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.07.001
|
[22]
|
庞继贤, 陈明瑶. 电视访谈中介入标记语的人际功能[J]. 浙江大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2006, 36(6): 168-176.
|
[23]
|
Cranford, C. (2002) Bring in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles (Writing). Technical Communication, 49, 262.
|