社会影响理论视角下网络从众及其影响因素
Social Influence Theory Perspective on Online Followership and Its Influencing Factors
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.137332, PDF,   
作者: 张 旭, 李开云*:济南大学教育与心理科学学院,山东 济南
关键词: 社会影响从众网络情景影响因素Social Influence Conformity Online Scenarios Influencing Factors
摘要: 从众是一个古老的课题,许多经典研究发现,个体会受到周围群体的影响,从而改变自身态度或行为。随着互联网的高速发展,人类的交互逐渐转变为在线的形式,网络上的群体同样会成为从众的动因。但由于匿名性等因素,网络群体与现实群体本质上是不同的,且现实情景的从众研究结论并不完全适用于网络从众,网络从众或许有着区别于现实从众的独特影响因素。社会影响理论可以更全面地解释不同动机的从众行为,且不受情景的限制。该理论视角下,匿名性、缺少的社会存在等因素导致网络情景中规范性影响的效果或方式可能与现实情景不同,而信息性影响的效果依然明显。据此进一步总结网络从众的独特影响因素,未来研究可以进一步采用不同实验范式,系统对比不同情景中社会影响的作用差异。
Abstract: Conformity is an age-old topic, and many classic studies have found that individuals are influenced by the groups around them to change their own attitudes or behaviors. With the rapid development of the Internet, human interaction has gradually changed to an online format, and groups on the Internet can also be a motivation for conformity. However, due to anonymity and other factors, online groups are essentially different from real groups, and the findings of herding studies in real situations are not fully applicable to online herding, which may have unique influencing factors that are different from real herding. Social influence theory can explain different motivations of herding behavior more comprehensively and without the restriction of scenarios. In this theory perspective, factors such as anonymity and lack of social presence may lead to different effects or ways of normative influence in online scenarios than in real ones, while the effects of informational influence are still evident. Accordingly, to further summarize the unique influencing factors of online conformity, future research can further adopt different experimental paradigms to systematically compare the differences in the role of social influence in different scenarios.
文章引用:张旭, 李开云 (2023). 社会影响理论视角下网络从众及其影响因素. 心理学进展, 13(7), 2692-2702. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.137332

参考文献

[1] 成馨雅, 胡佳忆, 金航萍, 张芷旖, 徐静(2023). 新冠疫情背景下大学生网络谣言传播行为分析与治理. 宁波工程学院学报, 35(1), 128-132.
[2] 宋伟(2021). 突发性公共卫生事件对我国居民典型消费行为的影响机制研究. 博士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[3] 魏真瑜(2017). 博弈中的亲社会从众行为研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[4] 易牧农, 贺小双, 郝连续, 冯永春(2020). 在线消费社区内倾性成员的强迫性购买倾向研究——基于从众理论视角. 管理学刊, 33(4), 49-60.
[5] 周延, 周文悦, 唐奥威, 王一同, 杨桃莲(2022). 疫情期间新媒体舆论环境中盲目从众现象原因及应对措施研究. 新闻研究导刊, 13(21), 86-88.
[6] Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.[CrossRef
[7] Beran, T., Drefs, M., Kaba, A., Al Baz, N., & Al Harbi, N. (2015). Conformity of Responses among Graduate Students in an Online Environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 63-69.[CrossRef
[8] Blake, R. R., Helson, H., & Mouton, J. S. (1957). The Generality of Conformity Behavior as a Function of Factual Anchorage. Difficulty of Task, and Amount of Social Pressure. Journal of Personality, 25, 294-305.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.[CrossRef
[10] Brown, R. J., Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Minimal Group Situations and Intergroup Discrimination: Comments on the Paper by Aschenbrenner and Schaefer. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 399-414.[CrossRef
[11] Burnkrant, R. E., & Cousineau, A. (1975). Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 206-215.[CrossRef
[12] Chen, X., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhai, Y., Zhang, Z., & Feng, C. (2022). Different Drives of Herding: An Exploratory Study of Motivations Underlying Social Conformity. PsyCh Journal, 70, 1-70.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Chen, Y. F., & Lu, H. F. (2015). We-Commerce: Exploring Factors Influencing Online Group-Buying Intention in Taiwan from a Conformity Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 62-75.[CrossRef
[14] Cinnirella, M., & Green, B. (2007). Does “Cyber-Conformity” Vary Cross-Culturally? Exploring the Effect of Culture and Communication Medium on Social Conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2011-2025.[CrossRef
[15] Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and Character. American Psychologist, 10, 191-198.[CrossRef
[16] Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Diener, E., Lusk, R., DeFour, D., & Flax, R. (1980). Deindividuation: Effects of Group Size, Density, Number of Observers, and Group Member Similarity on Self-Consciousness and Disinhibited Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 449-459.[CrossRef
[18] Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1985). Gender and Influenceability: Stereotype versus Behavior. In Women, Gender, and Social Psychology (pp. 225-256). Erlbaum.
[19] Gergen, K. J., & Bauer, R. A. (1967). Interactive Effects of Self-Esteem and Task Difficulty on Social Conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 16-22.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Greenberg, J., & Liljeholm, M. (2021). Stakes and Expertise Modulate Conformity in Economic Choice. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 23369.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147-166.
[22] Hertz, T., Jayasundera, T., Piraino, P., Selcuk, S., Smith, N., & Verashchagina, A. (2008). The Inheritance of Educational Inequality: International Comparisons and Fifty-Year Trends. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7, Article No. 10.[CrossRef
[23] Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.[CrossRef
[24] Hu, X. et al. (2022), Status Reinforcing: Unintended Rating Bias on Online Shopping Platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, Article ID: 102995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of Opinion Change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.[CrossRef
[26] Latane, B. (1981). The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.[CrossRef
[27] Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-Mediated Communication: Deindividuation and Group Decision-Making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.[CrossRef
[28] Lee, E. J., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting via Computers Differs from Interacting with Computers. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.[CrossRef
[29] Lee, E., & Lee, B. (2012). Herding Behavior in Online P2P Lending: An Empirical Investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 495-503.[CrossRef
[30] Lee, E.-J. (2006). When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication? Communication Research, 33, 423-447.[CrossRef
[31] Lee, E.-J., & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting via Computers Differs from Interacting with Computers. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.[CrossRef
[32] Lee, K. (2009). Gender Differences in Hong Kong Adolescent Consumers’ Green Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 87-96.[CrossRef
[33] Limei, C., & Wei, L. (2020). The Impact of Reviewers’ Creditworthiness on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Edge Path: Implications for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, Article ID: 619263.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Mahmoodi, A., Nili, H., Bang, D., Mehring, C., & Bahrami, B. (2022). Distinct Neurocomputational Mechanisms Support Informational and Socially Normative Conformity. PLoS Biology, 20, 423-447.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Mannes, A. E. (2009). Are We Wise about the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision. Management Science, 55, 1267-1279.[CrossRef
[36] McKenna, K. Y., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual Group Dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 116-127.[CrossRef
[37] Mckinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction. Information Systems Research, 13, 296-315.[CrossRef
[38] NG YEW KANG (2021). 跨境电商消费者行为影响因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江大学.
[39] Nord, W. R. (1969). Social Exchange Theory: An Integrative Approach to Social Conformity. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 174-208.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Perfumi, S. C., Bagnoli, F., Caudek, C., & Guazzini, A. (2019). Deindividuation Effects on Normative and Informational Social Influence within Computer-Mediated-Communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 230-237.[CrossRef
[41] Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. ACR North American Advances, 11, 668-672.
[42] Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and Antinormative Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.[CrossRef
[43] Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social Influence in Computermediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.[CrossRef
[44] Rashotte, L. (2007). Social Influence. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.[CrossRef
[45] Rosander, M., & Eriksson, O. (2012). Conformity on the Internet—The Role of Task Difficulty and Gender Differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1587-1595.[CrossRef
[46] Savolainen, I., Oksa, R., Savela, N., Celuch, M., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Covid-19 Anxiety—A Longitudinal Survey Study of Psychological and Situational Risks among Finnish Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article No. 794.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Schnuerch, R., Koppehele-Gossel, J., & Gibbons, H. (2015). Weak Encoding of Faces Predicts Socially Influenced Judgments of Facial Attractiveness. Social Neuroscience, 10, 624-634.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
[49] Smilowitz, M., Compton, D. C., & Flint, L. (1988). The Effects of Computer Mediated Communication on an Individual’s Judgment: A Study Based on the Methods of Asch’s Social Influence Experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 311-321.[CrossRef
[50] Sowden, S., Koletsi, S., Lymberopoulos, E., Militaru, E., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2018). Quantifying Compliance and Acceptance through Public and Private Social Conformity. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 359-367.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Watt, S. (2018). A SIDE View of Social Influence. In K. D. Williams, & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes (pp. 331-350). Psychology Press.
[52] Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 131-150.[CrossRef
[53] Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
[54] Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Goncalves, J. (2020). Impact of Contextual and Personal Determinants on Online Social Conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, Article ID: 106302.[CrossRef
[55] Ye, Y., Zhang, R., Zhao, Y., Yu, Y., Du, W., & Chen, T. (2022). A Novel Public Opinion Polarization Model Based on BA Network. Systems, 10, Article No. 46.[CrossRef
[56] Zhang, D., Lowry, P. B., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2007). The Impact of Individualism-Collectivism, Social Presence, and Group Diversity on Group Decision Making under Majority Influence. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 23, 53-80.[CrossRef
[57] Zhang, J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational Herding in Microloan Markets. Management Science, 58, 892-912.[CrossRef
[58] Zhang, K., & Chen, X. (2017). Herding in a P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference OR Irrational Trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 23, 45-53.[CrossRef
[59] Zhao, K., Stylianou, A. C., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Sources and Impacts of Social Influence from Online Anonymous User Reviews. Information & Management, 55, 16-30.[CrossRef
[60] Zheng, J., Hu, L., Li, L., Shen, Q., & Wang, L. (2021). Confidence Modulates the Conformity Behavior of the Investors and Neural Responses of Social Influence in Crowdfunding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article ID: 766908.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason, and Order versus Deindividuation, Impulse, and Chaos. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237-307). University of Nebraska Press.