[1]
|
Tham, Y.C., Li, X., Wong, T.Y., et al. (2014) Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmology, 121, 2081-2090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
|
[2]
|
Heijl, A. (2015) Glaucoma Treatment: By the Highest Level of Evidence. The Lancet, 386, 264-1266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62347-3
|
[3]
|
Sugar, H.S. (1963) Some Recent Advances in the Surgery of Glaucoma. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 39, 3-20.
|
[4]
|
Rulli, E., Biagioli, E., Riva, I., et al. (2013) Ef-ficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy vs Non-Penetrating Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Ophthalmology, 131, 1573-1582.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059
|
[5]
|
Arora, K.S., Robin, A.L., Corcoran, K.J., et al. (2015) Use of Various Glaucoma Surgeries and Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012. Ophthalmology, 122, 1615-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.015
|
[6]
|
Edmunds, B., Thompson, J.R., Salmon, J.F., et al. (2001) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in Operative Technique and Outcome. Eye (London), 15, 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.152
|
[7]
|
Chen, T.C., Wilensky, J.T., and Viana, M.A. (1997) Long-Term Follow-Up of Initially Successful Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology, 104, 1120-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30174-2
|
[8]
|
Landers, J., Martin, K., Sarkies, N., et al. (2012) A Twen-ty-Year Follow-Up Study of Trabeculectomy: Risk Factors and Outcomes. Ophthalmology, 119, 694-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043
|
[9]
|
Bevin, T.H., Molteno, A.C. and Herbison, P. (2008) Otago Glaucoma Surgery Outcome Study: Long-Term Results of 841 Trabeculectomies. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmol-ogy, 36, 731-737.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01896.x
|
[10]
|
Chen, C.W. (1983) Enhanced Intraocular Pressure Control-ling Effectiveness of Trabeculectomy by Local Application of Mitomycin C. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 9, 172-177.
|
[11]
|
Heuer, D.K., Parrish, R.K., Gressel, M.G., et al. (1984) 5-Fluorouracil and Glaucoma Filtering Surgery. II A Pilot Study. Ophthalmology, 91, 84-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34291-9
|
[12]
|
The Fluor-ouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group (1996) Five-Year Follow-Up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. Ameri-can Journal of Ophthalmology, 121, 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70431-3
|
[13]
|
Shapiro, M.S., Thoft, R.A., Friend, J., et al. (1985) 5-Fluorouracil Toxicity to the Ocular Surface Epithelium. Investigative Ophthalmol-ogy & Visual Science, 26, 580-583.
|
[14]
|
Franks, W.A. and Hitchings, R.A. (1991) Complications of 5-Fluorouracil after Trabeculectomy. Eye (London), 5, 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.63
|
[15]
|
Katz, G.J., Higginbotham, E.J., Lichter, P.R., et al. (1995) Mitomycin C versus 5-Fluorouracil in High-Risk Glaucoma Filtering Surgery. Extended Follow-Up. Ophthalmology, 102, 1263-1269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30875-5
|
[16]
|
Kitazawa, Y., Kawase, K., Matsushita, H., et al. (1991) Tra-beculectomy with Mitomycin. A Comparative Study with Fluorouracil. Archives of Ophthalmology, 109, 1693-1698. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080120077030
|
[17]
|
Smith, M.F., Sherwood, M.B., Doyle, J.W., et al. (1992) Results of Intraoperative 5-Fluorouracil Supplementation on Trabeculectomy for Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ameri-can Journal of Ophthalmology, 114, 737-741.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74053-X
|
[18]
|
Bell, K., de Padua Soares Bezerra, B., Mofokeng, M., et al. (2021) Learning from the Past: Mitomycin C Use in Trabeculectomy and Its Application in Bleb-Forming Minimally In-vasive Glaucoma Surgery. Survey of Ophthalmology, 66, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.05.005
|
[19]
|
Fuller, J.R., Bevin, T.H., Molteno, A.C., et al. (2002) An-ti-Inflammatory Fibrosis Suppression in Threatened Trabeculectomy Bleb Failure Produces Good Long Term Control of Intraocular Pressure without Risk of Slight Threatening Complications. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86, 1352-1354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.12.1352
|
[20]
|
CAT-152 TSG, Khaw, P., Grehn, F., et al. (2007) A Phase III Study of Subconjunctival Human Anti-Transforming Growth Factor beta(2)monoclonal Antibody (CAT-152) to Prevent Scarring after First-Time Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology, 114, 1822-1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.050
|
[21]
|
Li, Z., Van Bergen, T., van de Veire, S., et al. (2009) Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Reduces Scar Formation after Glaucoma Filtration Surgery. Investigative Oph-thalmology & Visual Science, 50, 5217-5225.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2662
|
[22]
|
Van Bergen, T., Vandewalle, E., van de Veire, S., et al. (2011) The Role of Different VEGF Isoforms in Scar Formation after Glaucoma Filtration Surgery. Experimental Eye Research, 93, 689-699.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.08.016
|
[23]
|
Cheng, J.W., Cheng, S.W., Wei, R.L., et al. (2016) Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Control of Wound Healing in Glaucoma Surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, 1, CD009782.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009782.pub2
|
[24]
|
Kopsinis, G., Tsoukanas, D., Kopsini, D., et al. (2021) In-tracameral Bevacizumab versus Sub-Tenon’s Mitomycin C as Adjuncts to Trabeculectomy: 3-Year Results of a Prospec-tive Randomized Study. Clinical Medicine, 10, Article No. 2054. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102054
|
[25]
|
He, M., Wang, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2014) Ologen Implant versus Mitomycin C for Trabeculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 9, e85782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085782
|
[26]
|
Cillino, S., Casuccio, A., Di Pace, F., et al. (2016) Biodegradable Collagen Matrix Implant versus Mitomycin-C in Trabeculectomy: Five-Year Follow-Up. BMC Ophthalmology, 16, Article No. 24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0198-0
|
[27]
|
Edmunds, B., Thompson, J.R., Salmon, J.F., et al. (2002) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early Late Complications. Eye, 16, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700148
|
[28]
|
Gedde, S.J., Herndon, L.W., Brandt, J.D., et al. (2007) Surgical Com-plications in the Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study during the First Year of Follow-Up. American Journal of Ophthal-mology, 143, 23-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.022
|
[29]
|
Azuara-Blanco, A. and Katz, L.J. (1998) Dysfunctional Filtering Blebs. Survey of Ophthalmology, 43, 93-126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(98)00025-3
|
[30]
|
Cameron, B., Field, M., Ball, S., et al. (2006) Circumferential Viscodilation of Schlemm’s Canal with a Flexible Microcannula during Non-Penetrating Glaucoma Surgery. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology, 12, 1.
|
[31]
|
Harvey, B.J. and Khaimi, M.A. (2011) A Review of Canaloplasty. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, 25, 329-336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.08.003
|
[32]
|
Lewis, R.A., von Wolff, K., Tetz, M., et al. (2011) Canaloplasty: Three-Year Results of Circumferential Viscodilation and Tensioning of Schlemm Canal Using a Microcatheter to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 37, 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.055
|
[33]
|
Lewis, R.A., von Wolff, K., Tetz, M., et al. (2009) Canaloplasty: Circumferential Viscodilation and Tensioning of Schlemm Canal Using a Flexible Microcatheter for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma in Adults: Two-Year Interim Clinical Study Results. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 35, 814-824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.010
|
[34]
|
Lewis, R.A., von Wolff, K., Tetz, M., et al. (2007) Canaloplasty: Circumferential Viscodilation and Tensioning of Schlemm’s Canal Using a Flexible Microcatheter for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma in Adults: Interim Clinical Study Analysis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 33, 1217-1226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.051
|
[35]
|
Bull, H., von Wolff, K., Korber, N., et al. (2011) Three-Year Canaloplasty Outcomes for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: European Study Results. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 249, 1537-1545.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1728-3
|
[36]
|
Grieshaber, M.C., Pienaar, A., Olivier, J., et al. (2010) Canalo-plasty for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Long-Term Outcome. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94, 1478-1482. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.163170
|
[37]
|
Brusini, P. (2014) Canaloplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma Surgery: A Four-Year Follow-Up. Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID: 469609. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/469609
|
[38]
|
Brusini, P., Caramello, G., Benedetti, S., et al. (2016) Canaloplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma: Mid-Term Results from a Multicenter Study. Glaucoma, 25, 403-407. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000103
|
[39]
|
Voykov, B. and Rohrbach, J.M. (2016) Revision Procedures after Canaloplasty. Ophthalmology, 113, 910-913.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-016-0314-9
|
[40]
|
Ayyala, R.S., Chaudhry, A.L., Okogbaa, C.B., et al. (2011) Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Canaloplasty and Trabeculectomy at 12 Months’ Follow-Up. Ophthalmology, 118, 2427-2433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.021
|
[41]
|
Bruggemann, A., Despouy, J.T., Wegent, A., et al. (2013) Intra-individual Comparison of Canaloplasty versus Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C in a Single-Surgeon Series. Glaucoma, 22, 577-583.
https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255bb30
|
[42]
|
Matlach, J., Dhillon, C., Hain, J., et al. (2015) Trabeculecto-my versus Canaloplasty (TVC Study) in the Treatment of Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Random-ized Clinical Trial. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93, 753-761.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12722
|
[43]
|
Lin, Z.J., Xu, S., Huang, S.Y., et al. (2016) Comparison of Canaloplasty and Trabeculectomy for Open Angle Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 9, 1814-1819.
|
[44]
|
Zhang, B., Kang, J. and Chen, X. (2017) A System Review and Meta-Analysis of Canaloplasty Out-comes in Glaucoma Treatment in Comparison with Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology, 2017, Article ID: 2723761.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2723761
|