低生育率背景下重庆市育龄女性原生家庭亲密度和适应性对生育动机的影响研究
The Effects of Family Intimacy and Adaptability on Fertility Motivation of Women of Childbearing Age in Chongqing under the Background of Low Fertility Rate
摘要: 目的:探讨育龄女性的生育动机与原生家庭亲密度、原生家庭适应性之间的关系。方法:选取重庆市育龄女性255人,采用生育动机问卷、家庭亲密度与适应性问卷。结果:1) 生育动机在是否独生上没有表现出显著性差异,原生家庭亲密度与适应性在是否独生上有显著差异。2) 生育动机在户籍所在地上表现出显著性差异,但是原生家庭亲密度与适应性在户籍所在地上未表现出显著性差异。3) 育龄女性的生育动机在学历上表现出显著差异,但是原生家庭的亲密度与适应性在学历上未表现出显著差异。4) 育龄女性的生育动机与原生家庭亲密度、适应性之间存在显著正相关。5) 原生家庭亲密度与适应性均能显著正向预测育龄女性的生育动机。结论:育龄女性的生育动机受到其原生家庭亲密度以及原生家庭适应性的影响。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between reproductive motivation of childbearing women and family closeness and adaptability of family of origin. Methods: A total of 255 women of childbearing age in Chongqing were selected. The fertility motivation questionnaire, family closeness and adaptability questionnaire were used. Results: 1) There was no significant difference in fertility motivation, but there was significant difference in family closeness and adaptability. 2) There is a significant difference in fertility motivation in the domicile location, but there is no significant difference in family closeness and adaptability in the domicile location. 3) Educational background shows a significant difference in the fertility motivation of women of childbearing age, but there is no significant difference in the closeness and adaptability of family of origin. 4) There is a significant positive correlation between fertility motivation of women of childbearing age and family closeness and adaptability. 5) Both the closeness of family of origin and adaptability can significantly positively predict the fertility motivation of women of childbearing age. Conclusion: The fertility motivation of women of childbearing age is affected by the closeness and adaptability of their family of origin.
文章引用:谭雅兰, 陈薪, 朱小丹 (2021). 低生育率背景下重庆市育龄女性原生家庭亲密度和适应性对生育动机的影响研究. 心理学进展, 11(8), 1956-1962. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.118220

参考文献

[1] 陈滔, 胡安宁(2020). 个体主义还是家庭主义?——不同生育动机对生育行为的影响效应分析. 江苏社会科学, (2), 28-38.
[2] 方力维, 李祚山, 向琦祺, 陈晓科(2018). 育龄青年生育动机的问卷编制及信效度检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 26(1), 115-119.
[3] 费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 赵靖平, 蒋少艾, 王立伟, 汪向东(1991). “家庭亲密度和适应性量表”和“家庭环境量表”的初步评价——正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, (5), 198-202+238.
[4] 李孜, 谭江蓉, 黄匡时(2019). 重庆市生育水平、生育意愿及生育成本. 人口研究, (3), 45-56.
[5] 王军, 王广州(2016). 中国低生育水平下的生育意愿与生育行为差异研究. 人口学刊, 38(2), 5-17.
[6] 毋嫘, 邓林涛, 柳杏娟, 赵亚萍, 林冰心(2019). 原生家庭功能和共依附对亲密关系质量的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理科学, (4), 898-904.
[7] 袁亚芬, 郑松(2018). 育龄期女性癌症患者的原生家庭亲密度与适应性及其对生育忧虑的影响. 中国护理管理, 18(12), 1719-1723.
[8] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[9] 朱明宝, 杨云彦(2017). 幸福感与居民的生育意愿——基于CGSS2013数据的经验研究. 经济学动态, (3), 52-61.
[10] Liu, L. S., Xu, L. Y., Luo, F., & Li, Y. F. (2018). Intergenerational Transmission of Interpersonal Strengths: The Role of Parent Gender, Family Processes, and Child Characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 67, 66-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.06.005
[11] Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2010). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: VI. Theoretical Update. Family Process, 22, 144-167.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144