工作记忆中的注意焦点转换:更新和背景存取过程
Switching of the Focus of Attention in Working Memory: Processes of Updating and Context Access
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.104057, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 630  浏览: 921  科研立项经费支持
作者: 郑允佳:广东金融学院应用心理学系,广东 广州;胡耿丹:同济大学心理学系,上海
关键词: 工作记忆注意焦点转换更新背景存取Working Memory Switching of the Focus of Attention Updating Context Access
摘要: 本文考察工作记忆中注意焦点转换的更新和背景存取过程。两个实验要求被试在工作记忆中暂时储存三个数字,并对这三个数字进行一系列运算。实验1设置两种运算序列:“提取且更新序列”要求被试每次提取三个数字中的一个,并对这一数字进行更新;“提取序列”只要求被试提取数字,而无需对数字更新。结果显示,“提取且更新序列”中的转换代价大于“提取序列”中的转换代价。实验2要求被试每次使用一个算式的结果替代三个数字中的一个,并设置两种运算条件:在“更新条件”下,算式的结果与被替代的数字不同;在“非更新条件”下,算式的结果与被替代的数字相同。结果显示,“更新条件”下的转换代价大于“非更新条件”下的转换代价;在“非更新条件”下,注意焦点只需在背景位置之间转换,也存在显著的转换代价。两个实验的结果说明,注意焦点转换包括更新和背景存取过程。
Abstract: The study investigated processes of updating and context access in switching of the focus of atten-tion in working memory. Two experiments required participants to apply successive operations to three digits in working memory. Experiment 1 consisted of two operating sequences. In “retrieval and updating sequence”, participants had to retrieve one of three digits, and update this digit. “Retrieval sequence” only required participants to retrieve the digits, but without the requirement to update the digits. Results showed that switching costs were larger in “retrieval and updating sequence” than in “retrieval sequence”. Experiment 2 required participants to use the results of equations to replace one of three digits, and two operating conditions were consisted. The results of equations were the same as the digits it replaced for “non-updating condition”, and different for “updating condition”. Results showed that switching costs were larger in “updating condition” than in “non-updating condition”, and switching costs were significant in “non-updating condition”, in which only context access was included. The present results demonstrated that processes of updating and context access were involved in switching of the focus of attention.
文章引用:郑允佳, 胡耿丹 (2020). 工作记忆中的注意焦点转换:更新和背景存取过程. 心理学进展, 10(4), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.104057

参考文献

[1] Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2011). Three Layers of Working Memory: Focus-Switch Costs and Retrieval Dynamics as Revealed by the N-Count Task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 204-219.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.481621
[2] Berti, S. (2016). Switching Attention within Working Memory Is Reflected in the P3a Component of the Human Event-Related Brain Potential. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 701.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00701
[3] Chang, E. P., Ecker, U. K. H., & Page, A. C. (2017). Impaired Memory Updating Associated with Impaired Recall of Negative Words in Dysphoric Rumination-Evidence for a Removal Deficit. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 93, 22-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.03.008
[4] Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Removal of Information from Working Memory: A Specific Updating Process. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 77-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.003
[5] Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. H. (2010). The Components of Working Memory Updating: An Experimental Decomposition and Individual Differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 170-189.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017891
[6] Ecker, U. K. H., Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Working Memory Updating Involves Item-Specific Removal. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.006
[7] Frenken, M., & Berti, S. (2018). Exploring the Switching of the Focus of Attention within Working Memory: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 126, 30-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.012
[8] Garavan, H. (1998). Serial Attention within Working Memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 263-276.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201138
[9] Janczyk, M. (2017). A Common Capacity Limitation for Response and Item Selection in Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1690-1698.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000408
[10] Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2006). All Updateable Objects in Working Memory Are Updated Whenever Any of Them Are Modified: Evidence from the Memory Updating Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 570-585.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.570
[11] Lendinez, C., Pelegrina, S., & Lechuga, M. T. (2015). Age Differ-ences in Working Memory Updating: The Role of Interference, Focus Switching and Substituting Information. Acta Psy-chologica, 157, 106-113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.015
[12] Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Kessler, Y., & Oberauer, K. (2018). The Removal of Information from Working Memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424, 33-44.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13714
[13] Linares, R., & Pelegrina, S. (2018). Focus Switching in Working Memory: The Roles of Context Access and Content Retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 65, 115-127.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000397
[14] Linares, R., Bajo, M. T., & Pelegrina, S. (2016). Age-Related Dif-ferences in Working Memory Updating Components. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 39-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.009
[15] Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to Information in Working Memory: Exploring the Focus of Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411-421.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.411
[16] Oberauer, K., & Hein, L. (2012). Attention to Information in Working Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 164-169.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412444727
[17] Oberauer, K., & Lin, H. Y. (2017). An Interference Model of Visual Working Memory. Psychological Review, 124, 21-59.
https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000044
[18] Oberauer, K., & Vockenberg, K. (2009). Updating of Working Memory: Lingering Bindings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 967-987.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802372912
[19] Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. D. (2013). Analogous Mechanisms of Selection and Updating in Declarative and Procedural Working Memory: Experiments and a Computational Model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 157-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11.001
[20] Price, J. M., Colflesh, G. J. H., Cerella, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making Working Memory Work: The Effects of Extended Practice on Focus Capacity and the Processes of Up-dating, forward Access, and Random Access. Acta Psychologica, 148, 19-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.008
[21] Qin, S., & Basak, C. (2020). Age-Related Differences in Brain Ac-tivation during Working Memory Updating: An fMRI Study. Neuropsychologia, 138, Article ID: 107335.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107335
[22] Singh, K. A., Gignac, G. E., Brydges, C. R., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2018). Working Memory Capacity Mediates the Relationship between Removal and Fluid Intelligence. Journal of Memory and Language, 101, 18-36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.03.002
[23] Stewart, T. M., Hunter, S. C., & Rhodes, S. M. (2019). Reflective Pondering Is Associated with Executive Control for Emotional Information: An Adolescent Prospective Study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 65, Article ID: 101486.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101486
[24] Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2008). Speed and Accuracy of Accessing Information in Working Memory: An Individual Differences Investigation of Focus Switching. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 616-630.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.616
[25] Verhaeghen, P., Geigerman, S., Yang, H. X., Montoya, A. C., & Rahnev, D. (2019). Resolving Age-Related Differences in Working Memory: Equating Perception and Attention Makes Older Adults Remember as Well as Younger Adults. Experimental Aging Research, 45, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586120