生物降解地膜周年降解特性对北方灌区玉米增产机理研究
Study on the Maize Yield-Increasing Mechanism of Annual Degradation Characteristics about Different Biodegradable Film in the Northern Irrigation Area
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2017.72007, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,717  浏览: 3,441  科研立项经费支持
作者: 王平生, 韩 宏*, 黄青岩, 杨 霞:甘肃省临夏州农业科学院,甘肃 临夏;周 涛:甘肃省农业生态环境保护站,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 玉米生物降解地膜降解性能产量Maize Biological Degradable Film Degradability Yield
摘要: 生物降解地膜是解决地膜残留污染问题的重要途径,对农业发展潜力巨大,但不同生物降解地膜对不同生态区域玉米生长的适配性各异,影响其推广应用。本文通过大田试验,从地膜田间降解特性、土壤保温性、作物生长发育、产量及其构成因子、残留地膜覆盖率等方面对9种可降解生物地膜与普通PE (CK1)地膜和露地栽培(CK2)进行了对比研究。结果表明:试验筛选出GS05、GS09、GS10和GS03四种生物可降解地膜,玉米生长前期降解缓慢,中期和后期降解较快,与玉米生长发育适配性较好;10 cm处土层地温在玉米全生育期、出苗至拔节期、抽雄至灌浆期分别比CK1降低0.1℃~0.5℃、0.5℃~1.0℃、0.2℃~ −0.5℃;成熟至收获期日较差提高了−0.9℃~0.6℃;出苗率、株高、茎粗、棒穗长、每棒穗粒数、千粒重分别比(CK1)提高了−3.3~3.4百分点、−16.7~−3.5 cm、−0.2~−0.3 cm、−2.7~0.0 cm、−33.7~−16.4粒、−17.3~−7.0 g;玉米产量12,664.5~14,493.0 kg/hm2,较CK1减产0.6%~13.1%,说明四种生物可降解地膜和普通地膜对玉米产量影响差异不大,较CK2增产86.3%~113.1%,产量差异达极显著水平。四种生物可降解地膜的覆盖率,玉米收获时分别为25.8%、64.3%、24.4%和51.5%,至翌年玉米播种时分别为3.3%、7.4%、6.2%和16.5%,说明四种生物可降解地膜的降解特性基本符合北方高海拔灌区玉米生长对环境的要求,完全可以替代传统地膜。
Abstract: Biodegradable plastic film is an important way to solve the problem of plastic film residue pollu-tion. It has great potential for agricultural development, but different biodegradable plastic films were different in different ecological regions and affected its popularization and application. In this paper, comparative field experiments were carried out among three cultivation methods, 9 biodegradable films cultivation, ordinary PE (CK1) film cultivation and open field cultivation (CK2), from field degradability of plastic film, soil thermal insulation, crop growth, yield and its composition factors, residual plastic film coverage and so on. The result showed that the degradation of the selected four kinds of biodegradable plastic films GS05, GS09, GS10 and GS03 was slow at the early growth stage of maize and quicker in the middle and later stages, and the growth adaptability of maize was better. The soil temperature in the whole maize growth period at 10 cm soil layer from emergence to jointing stage, from tasseling to filling stage compared to CK1, decreased from 0.1˚C to 0.5˚C, from 0.5˚C to 1.0˚C and from 0.2˚C to 0.5˚C. The difference of maturity from harvest to maturity was improved by −0.9˚C - 0.6˚C. Emergence rate, plant height, stem diameter, panicle length, grain number perpanicle, 1000-grain weight compared to CK1 increased by −3.3 - 3.4 percentage points, −16.7 to −3.5 cm, −0.2 to −0.3 cm, −2.7 to 0.0 cm, −33.7 to −16.4, −17.3 to −7.0 g; maize yield was 12,664.5~14,493.0 kg/hm2, which was 0.6~13.1% less than that of CK1. The results showed that the effect of four biodegradable mulches and ordinary mulching film on maize yield was not significant, which was 86.3% - 113.1% higher than that of CK2, and the difference was significant. The coverage of the four kinds of biodegradable mulching films was 25.8%, 64.3%, 24.4% and 51.5% respectively when corn was harvested, which was 3.3%, 7.4%, 6.2% and 16.5%. These results indicated that the degradation characteristics of the four biodegradable plastic mulch basically accorded with the environmental requirements of maize growth in the high elevation irrigation area of northern China, and could replace the traditional mulching film.
文章引用:王平生, 韩宏, 周涛, 黄青岩, 杨霞. 生物降解地膜周年降解特性对北方灌区玉米增产机理研究[J]. 农业科学, 2017, 7(2): 55-65. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2017.72007

参考文献

[1] 刘宇, 贲显明, 戴春红, 王金华. 生物降解地膜试验与推广应用[J]. 农民致富之友, 2016(3): 101.
[2] 张杰, 贾志宽, 李国领, 罗诗峰. 不同材料地膜覆盖对玉米生物学性状的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(12): 133-140, 147.
[3] 冯涛, 殷晓燕, 马栋, 孙向春. 6种降解地膜在3种作物上的应用初报[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2015(6): 3-8.
[4] 马彦, 杨虎德. 甘肃省农田地膜污染及防控措施调查[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(4): 478-483.
[5] 赵燕, 李淑芬, 吴杏红, 等. 我国可降解地膜的应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(23): 105-107.
[6] 高建平. 淀粉及生物降解材料[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 1998, 14(4): 16.
[7] 郑世杰, 陈英, 白志远, 刘义. 高标准基本农田建设精细评估——以临夏县北源地区为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9): 207-212.
[8] 何世海. 浅谈临夏县北源灌区水资源管理存在的问题及方法[J]. 甘肃农业, 2013(17): 60-62.
[9] 温善菊, 伍维模, 战勇, 等. 四种不同可降解地膜降解特性的比较研究[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2012, 24(1): 1-6.
[10] 唐薇, 张冬梅, 徐士振, 等. 生物降解膜降解特征及其对棉花生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(4): 21-24, 28.
[11] 战勇, 魏建军, 杨相昆, 张占琴. 可降解地膜的性能及在北疆棉田上的应用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(7): 202- 206.
[12] 胡宏亮, 韩之刚, 张国平. 生物降解地膜对玉米的生物学效应及其降解特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(2): 179-188.
[13] 吴从林, 黄介生, 沈荣开. 光–生双降解膜覆盖下的夏玉米试验研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2002, 21(2): 137-139.
[14] 乔海军. 生物降解地膜的降解过程及其对玉米生长的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业人学, 2007.
[15] 何文清, 赵彩霞, 刘爽, 严昌荣, 常蕊芹, 曹肆林. 全生物降解膜田间降解特征及其对棉花产量影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2011, 16(3): 21-27.
[16] 王鑫, 胥国宾, 任志刚, 张占军, 简毓峰, 张永明. 无公害可降解地膜对玉米生长及土壤环境的影响[J]. 中国农业生态学报, 2007, 15(1): 78-81.
[17] 乔海军, 黄高宝, 冯福学, 王利立. 生物全降解地膜的降解过程及其对玉米生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农大学报, 2008, 43(5): 71-75.
[18] 申丽霞, 王璞, 张丽丽. 可降解地膜对土壤温度, 水分及玉米生长发育的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(6): 25- 29.
[19] 闫桂华, 李岩. 旱作区玉米地膜覆盖增产机理研究[J]. 现代农业科技(农艺学), 2013(14): 50-51.
[20] 严昌荣, 何文清, 薛颖昊, 刘恩科, 刘勤. 生物降解地膜应用与地膜残留污染防控[J]. 生物工程学报, 2016, 32(6): 748-760.