[1]
|
顾红磊, 王才康(2012). 项目表述效应的统计控制: 以中文版生活定向测验为例. 心理科学, 35(5), 1247-1253.
|
[2]
|
郭庆科, 韩丹, 王昭, 时勘(2006). 人格测验中题目正反向陈述的效应. 心理学报, (4), 626-632.
|
[3]
|
郝亚楠, 宋勃东, 王岩, 张钦, 郎越(2016). 气质性乐观的正性偏向及其神经生理研究证据. 心理科学进展, 24(6), 946-957.
|
[4]
|
黎志华, 尹霞云, 蔡太生, 朱翠英(2013). 特质乐观的结构: 传统因素模型与双因素模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(1), 45-47.
|
[5]
|
罗杰, 戴晓阳(2011). “大五”人格测验在我国使用情况的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 740-742.
|
[6]
|
罗杰, 周瑗, 陈维, 潘运, 赵守盈(2016). 大五人格测验在中国应用的信度概化分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(1), 121-128.
|
[7]
|
麦玉娇, 温忠麟(2013). 探索性结构方程建模(ESEM): EFA和CFA的整合. 心理科学进展, 21(5), 934-939.
|
[8]
|
彭台光, 高月慈, 林鉦棽(2006). 管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質、影響、測試和補救. 管理學報, 23(1), 77-98.
|
[9]
|
王济川, 王小倩, 姜宝法(2011). 结构方程模型: 方法与应用. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
[10]
|
王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥(2011). 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ: 简式版的制定及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(4), 454-457.
|
[11]
|
吴永泽, 王文绢(2010). 不同应答等级对likert式量表特性的影响. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 18(2), 215-217.
|
[12]
|
袁立新, 林娜, 江晓娜(2007). 乐观主义-悲观主义量表的编制及信效度研究. 广东教育学院学报, (1), 55-59.
|
[13]
|
朱徽, 闫巩固(2015). 一般人格因素: 虚妄的杜撰还是真实的存在. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 643-653.
|
[14]
|
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Fagnani, C., Bentler, P. M., Barbaranelli, C., Medda, E., Nisticò, L., Stazi, M. A., & Caprara, G. V. (2010). Much More than Model Fitting? Evidence for the Heritability of Method Effect Associated with Positively Worded Items of the Life Orientation Test Revised. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.510064
|
[15]
|
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Tisak, J., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). Investigating the Nature of Method Factors through Multiple Informants: Evidence for a Specific Factor? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 625-642.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.589272
|
[16]
|
Arias, V. B., Jenaro, C., & Ponce, F. P. (2018). Testing the Generality of the General Factor of Personality: An Exploratory Bifactor Approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.042
|
[17]
|
Bert, W., Elke, C., & Niels, S. (2010). The Effect of Rating Scale Format on Response Styles: The Number of Response Categories and Response Category Labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 236-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004
|
[18]
|
Biderman, M. D., Nguyen, N. T., Cunningham, C. J. L., & Ghorbani, N. (2011). The Ubiquity of Common Method Variance: The Case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.05.001
|
[19]
|
Chester, A. S., & Kenneth, D. H. (1981). Controlling Acquiescence Response Bias by Item Reversals: The Effect on Questionnaire Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101-1114.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100420
|
[20]
|
Conway, J. M., Lievens, F., Scullen, S. E., & Lance, C. E. (2004). Bias in the Correlated Uniqueness Model for MTMM Data. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 535-559. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1104_3
|
[21]
|
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the Detection of Carelessly Invalid Responses in Survey Data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
|
[22]
|
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). High-er-Order Factors of the Big Five Predict Conformity: Are There Neuroses of Health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
|
[23]
|
DiStefano, C., &Motl, R. W. (2009). Personality Correlates of Method Effects Due to Negatively Worded Items on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 309-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.020
|
[24]
|
Gilljam, M., &Granberg, D. (1993). Should We Take Don’t Know for an Answer? Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 348-357.
https://doi.org/10.1086/269380
|
[25]
|
Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2017). Examining and Controlling for Wording Effect in a Self-Report Measure: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 545-555.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1286228
|
[26]
|
Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8
|
[27]
|
Johnson, J. M., Bristow, D. N., & Schneider, K. C. (2011). Did You Not Understand the Question or Not? An Investigation of Negatively Worded Questions in Survey Research. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 20, 75-86.
https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v20i1.2197
|
[28]
|
Maraz, A., Nagy, T., & Ziegler, M. (2021). When Bad Gets Worse: Negative Wording Amplifies Negative Recall in Persons with the Borderline Personality Trait. Applied Cognitive Psy-chology, 35, 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3764
|
[29]
|
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and Negative Global Self-Esteem: A Substantively Meaningful Distinction or Artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810
|
[30]
|
Marsh, H. W., & Parducci, A. (1978). Natural Anchoring at the Neutral Point of Category Rating Scales. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90025-2
|
[31]
|
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A New Look at the Big Five Factor Structure through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227
|
[32]
|
Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal Tests of Competing Factor Structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, Ephemeral Artifacts, and Stable Response Styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366-381.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019225
|
[33]
|
Martínez-Molina, A., & Arias, V. B. (2018). Balanced and Positively Worded Personality Short-Forms: Mini-IPIP Validity and Cross-Cultural Invariance. PeerJ, 6, e5542. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5542
|
[34]
|
Mayo, R., Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E. (2004). “I Am Not Guilty” vs “I Am Innocent”: Successful Negation May Depend on the Schema Used for Its Encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 433-449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.008
|
[35]
|
Michaelides, M. P., Zenger, M., Koutsogiorgi, C., Brähler, E., Stöbel-Richter, Y., & Berth, H. (2016). Personality Correlates and Gender Invariance of Wording Effects in the German Version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.011
|
[36]
|
Musek, J. (2007). A General Factor of Personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
|
[37]
|
Quilty, L. C., Oakman, J. M., & Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Method Effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_5
|
[38]
|
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.
https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
|
[39]
|
Riordan, A. O. (2021). Negative Item Response Bias in Education-Based Surveys—A Factor Modelling Approach. Working Papers, 04/2021, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
https://ideas.repec.org/p/sza/wpaper/wpapers364.html
|
[40]
|
Schriesheim, C. A., Eisenbach, R. J., & Hill, K. D. (1991). The Effect of Negation and Polar Opposite Item Reversals on Questionnaire Reliability and Validity: An Experimental Investigation. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 51, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491511005
|
[41]
|
Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2008). Factors Affecting Responses to Likert Type Questionnaires: Introduction of the ImpExp, a New Comprehensive Model. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 59-78.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9035-x
|
[42]
|
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model with 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
|
[43]
|
Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008). Assessing Three Sources of Misresponse to Reversed Likert Items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
|
[44]
|
Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
|
[45]
|
Urbán, R., Szigeti, R., Kökönyei, G., & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Global Self-Esteem and Method Effects: Competing Factor Structures, Longitudinal Invariance, and Response Styles in Adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 488-498.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0391-5
|
[46]
|
Wang, Y., Kong, F., Huang, L., & Liu, J. (2016). Neural Correlates of Biased Responses: The Negative Method Effect in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Is Associated with Right Amygdala Volume. Journal of Personality, 84, 623-632.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12185
|
[47]
|
Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., & Schillewaert, N. (2013). Reversed Item Bias: An Integrative Model. Psychological Methods, 18, 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032121
|
[48]
|
Weijters, B., Geuens, M., & Schillewaert, N. (2009). The Proximity Effect: The Role of Inter-Item Distance on Reverse-Item Bias. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.09.003
|
[49]
|
Wong, C., Peng, K. Z., Shi, J., & Mao, Y. (2011). Differences between Odd Number and Even Number Response Formats: Evidence from Mainland Chinese Respondents. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 379-399.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9143-6
|
[50]
|
Zhang, B., Li, Y. M., Li, J., Luo, J., Ye, Y., Yin, L., Chen, Z., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2021). The Big Five Inventory-2 in China: A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Four Diverse Samples. Assessment.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211008245
|