基于科学知识图谱的创新网络研究热点与前沿分析
Analysis of Hot Spots and Frontiers of Innovation Network Research Based on Scientific Knowledge Mapping
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2021.118113, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 528  浏览: 2,019  国家科技经费支持
作者: 邱祯君, 李晨光, 李雯欣, 何清遥：北方工业大学经济管理学院，北京
关键词: 创新网络；共词分析；知识图谱；CiteSpace；知识管理；Innovation Networks； Co-Word Analysis； Knowledge Graphs； CiteSpace； Knowledge Management
摘要: 网络化创新和创新活动的网络特征是当下创新研究关注的热点，本文使用CiteSpace软件，采用知识图谱分析方法对创新网络领域研究进行综述，借助Web of Science和CNKI数据库，通过分析文献本身包括摘要、内容、作者、时间等信息和文献间的应用关系，进行了词频、共现、时序和共引等多种图谱的分析，得出了创新网络的研究方向和领域分化，研究热点演化，研究主题和标志性研究等方面的发现。
Abstract: Networked innovation and the network characteristics of innovation activities are the hot topics of attention in innovation research nowadays. In this paper, we use CiteSpace software and adopt the knowledge graph analysis method to review the research in the field of innovation networks, and with the help of Web of Science and CNKI databases, we analyze the literature itself including abstract, content, author, time and other information and the application relationship between the literatures, and conduct a variety of graphs such as word frequency, co-occurrence, temporal order and co-citation that were analyzed to derive findings on research directions and domain differentiation, research hotspot evolution, research themes and landmark studies of innovation networks.
文章引用：邱祯君, 李晨光, 李雯欣, 何清遥. 基于科学知识图谱的创新网络研究热点与前沿分析[J]. 现代管理, 2021, 11(8): 894-904. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2021.118113

参考文献

[1] 刘兰剑, 司春林. 创新网络17年研究文献述评[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2009, 21(4): 68-77.
[2] 党兴华, 郑登攀. 对《创新网络17年研究文献述评》的进一步述评——技术创新网络的定义、形成与分类[J].研究与发展管理, 2011, 23(3): 9-15.
[3] 原长弘, 贾一伟. 国内创新网络研究基本状况和主要进展[J]. 科学学研究, 2003, 21(5): 552-555.
[4] 吕国庆, 曾刚, 顾娜娜. 经济地理学视角下区域创新网络的研究综述[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(2): 1-8.
[5] 金浩, 王平平, 赵晨光. 区域创新网络研究的计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(11): 1-9.
[6] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 胡志刚, 王贤文. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[7] Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003) Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohe-sion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3556658
[8] Burt, R.S. (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399.
https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
[9] Obstfeld, D. (2005) Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100-130.
https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
[10] Schilling, M.A. and Phelps, C.C. (2007) Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science, 53, 1113-1126.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
[11] Chesbrough, H. (2003) The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property. California Management Review, 45, 33-58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301
[12] Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006) Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Jour-nal, 27, 131-150.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
[13] Ahuja, G. (2000) Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425-455.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
[14] Dhanaraj, C. and Parkhe, A. (2006) Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31, 659-669.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
[15] Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. (2005) Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146-165.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
[16] Tsai, W. (2001) Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Net-works: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996-1004.
https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
[17] Zaheer, A. and Bell, G.G. (2005) Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 809-825.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482
[18] Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000) Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203-215.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C203::AID-SMJ102%3E3.0.CO;2-K
[19] Adner, R. and Kapoor, R. (2010) Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306-333.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
[20] Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B. and Park, J. (2010) Open Innovation in SMEs—An Intermediated Network Model. Research Policy, 39, 290-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
[21] Teece, D.J. (2007) Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[22] Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007) Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
[23] Yin, R.K. (2009) How to Do Better Case Studies. In: Bickman, L. and Rog, D.J., Eds., The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 2, SAGE Publications Inc., Thou-sand Oaks, 254-282.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n8
[24] Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and Innovation: A Critical As-sessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
[25] Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W.W. (2004) Knowledge Net-works as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Sci-ence, 15, 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0054

为你推荐