[1]
|
Ingall, T., Asplund, K., Mahonen, M., et al. (2000) A Multinational Comparison of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Epidemi-ology in the WHO MONICA Stroke Study. Stroke, 31, 1054-1061. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1054
|
[2]
|
Etminan, N., Chang, H., Hackenberg, K., et al. (2019) Worldwide Incidence of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage According to Region, Time Period, Blood Pressure, and Smoking Prevalence in the Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurology, 76, 588-597. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0006
|
[3]
|
Rosenwasser, R.H., Chalouhi, N., Tjoumakaris, S., et al. (2014) Open vs Endovascular Approach to Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery, 61, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000377
|
[4]
|
Holbrook, I., Beetham, R., Cruickshank, A., et al. (2007) Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. The Lancet, 369, 904-904.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60442-5
|
[5]
|
Li, H., et al. (2013) Clipping versus Coiling for Ruptured In-tracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 44, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663559
|
[6]
|
Phan, K., Huo, R.Y., Jia, F., et al. (2016) Meta-Analysis of Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling-Only for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Journal of Clinical Neuro-science, 31, 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.035
|
[7]
|
Algra, M.A., Lindgren, A., Vergouwen, I.D.M., et al. (2019) Pro-cedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurology, 76, 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4165
|
[8]
|
Van Rooij, S.B.T., Peluso, J.P., Sluzewski, M., et al. (2018) The New Low-Profile WEB 17 System for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: First Clinical Experiences. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 39, 859-863.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5608
|
[9]
|
Zimmer, S., Maus, V., Maurer, C., et al. (2021) Widening the Indications for Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: WEB 17 in the Treatment of Aneurysm Locations Different from Those in the Good Clinical Practice Trials. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 42, 524-529. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6946
|
[10]
|
Nimer, A., Mahmoud, D., Bengzon, D.J.D., et al. (2022) Multicenter Study for the Treatment of Sidewall versus Bifurcation Intracranial Aneurysms with Use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB). Radiology, 304, Article ID: 212006.
|
[11]
|
Goertz, L., Liebig, T., Siebert, E., et al. (2019) Extending the Indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Embolization to Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Multicenter Safety and Feasibility Study. World Neurosurgery, 126, E965-E974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198
|
[12]
|
Pierot, L., Biondi, A., Narata, A., et al. (2016) Should Indications for WEB Aneurysm Treatment Be Enlarged? Report of a Series of 20 Pa-tients with Aneurysms in “Atypical” Locations for WEB Treatment. Journal of Neuroradiology, 44, 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.011
|
[13]
|
Benjamin, M., Laurent, P. and Boris, L. (2014) Intrasaccular Flow-Diversion for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The Woven EndoBridge. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 11, 315-325.
https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2014.907741
|
[14]
|
Pierot, L., Moret, J., Turjman, F., et al. (2015) WEB Treat-ment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Feasibility, Complications, and 1-Month Safety Results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French Observatory. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36, 922-927. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4230
|
[15]
|
Nitin, G., Daniel, H., Julie, D., et al. (2020) How to WEB: A Practical Re-view of Methodology for the Use of the Woven EndoBridge. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 12, 512-520.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015506
|
[16]
|
Rodriguez-Calienes, A., Vivanco-Suarez, J., Galecio-Castillo, M., et al. (2023) Use of the Woven EndoBridge Device for Sidewall Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 44, 165-170.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7766
|
[17]
|
Brinjikji, W., Cloft, H., Lanzino, G., et al. (2009) Comparison of 2D Digi-tal Subtraction Angiography and 3D Rotational Angiography in the Evaluation of Dome-to-Neck Ratio. American Jour-nal of Neuroradiology, 30, 831-834.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1444
|
[18]
|
Cristian, M., Jildaz, C., Igor, P., et al. (2019) Safety and Efficiency of the Fifth Generation Woven EndoBridge Device: Technical Note. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 11, 511-515.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343
|
[19]
|
Christoph, K., Lukas, G., Eberhard, S., et al. (2019) WEB Embolization versus Stent-Assisted Coiling: Comparison of Complication Rates and Angiographic Outcomes. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 11, 812-816.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014555
|
[20]
|
Hurst, R. (2014) Response to Letter to the Editor. Antiplate-let Therapy and the WEB II Device. The Neuroradiology Journal, 27, 370. https://doi.org/10.15274/NRJ-2014-10049
|
[21]
|
Pierot, L., Cognard, C., Spelle, L., et al. (2012) Safety and Efficacy of Balloon Remodeling Technique during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Critical Review of the Lit-erature. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33, 12-15. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2403
|
[22]
|
Kainaat, J., Adisson, F., Ryan, H., et al. (2023) Identifying Risk Factors for Perioperative Thromboembolic Complications in Pa-tients Treated with the Woven EndoBridge Device. Interventional Neuroradiology, 29, 561-569.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221113907
|
[23]
|
Abbasi, M., Savasatano, L.E., Brinjikji, W., et al. (2022) Endo-luminal Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Sidewall and Bifurcation Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis of Complications and Angiographic Outcomes. Interventional Neuroradiology, 28, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199211026713
|
[24]
|
David, F., Adam, A., James, B., et al. (2015) Interobserver Var-iability in the Assessment of Aneurysm Occlusion with the WEB Aneurysm Embolization System. Journal of Neuroin-terventional Surgery, 7, 591-595.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011251
|
[25]
|
Lubicz, B., Klisch, J., Gauvrit, J.Y., et al. (2014) WEB-DL Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: Short- and Midterm Results in a European Study. Amer-ican Journal of Neuroradiology, 35, 432-438.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3869
|
[26]
|
Jildaz, C., Cristian, M., Titien, T., et al. (2016) Occlusion Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device. Neuroradiology, 58, 887-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1715-9
|
[27]
|
Lukas, G., Thomas, L., Eberhard, S., et al. (2021) Intrasaccular Flow-Disruption with the Woven EndoBridge for Narrow-Necked Aneurysms: A Safety and Feasibility Study. World Neurosurgery, 151, E278-E285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.018
|
[28]
|
Timsit, C., Soize, S., Benaissa, A., et al. (2016) Con-trast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 37, 1684-1689. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4791
|
[29]
|
Teresa, M.N., Jan, S., Andreas, F., et al. (2018) Multiparametric MRI of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): A Case of Faraday’s Cage? Journal of Neurointer-ventional Surgery, 10, 988-994.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013625
|
[30]
|
Laurent, P. (2015) Letter: WEB Aneurysm Treatment: Oc-clusion Stability and “Compression”. Neurosurgery, 77, E666-E667. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000880
|