角色冲突对团队结果作用的实证研究—团队沟通水平的中介作用
The Empirical Study of Role Conflict on Team Output Effects—The Mediating Role of Team Communication
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2017.71005, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 1,943  浏览: 5,931 
作者: 庄乐*, 沈蕾:东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海
关键词: 多团队成员身份角色冲突团队沟通团队结果实证研究Multiple Team Membership Role Conflict Team Communication Team Outcome Empirical Study
摘要: 本文的研究目的是探究在多团队成员身份的背景下,角色冲突和团队结果(包括任务绩效和工作满意度)之间的关系,并探究其作用机制。根据以往研究进行合理推演,通过对19个家庭医生服务团队的实证研究,采用相关分析和回归分析的研究方法,验证研究假设。研究结果表明,角色冲突与工作满意度、任务绩效之间总体负相关,通过降低团队沟通水平来影响团队结果;但角色冲突水平低时,可以一定程度上提高团队结果,从而给出实践建议。团队在采用具有多团队身份的团队成员时,需要平衡多团队成员身份带来的知识共享、促进团队学习、获取外部资源等优势以及可能造成的角色冲突,将角色冲突水平保持在合理水平,避免其对团队绩效和工作满意度的消极影响。
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between role conflict and team outcome (including task performance and job satisfaction) in the context of multiple team membership, and to explore its mechanism. Based on the previous studies, correlation analysis and regression analysis were used to verify the research hypothesis through an empirical study of 19 family doctor service teams. The results show that there is an overall negative correlation between role conflict and job satisfaction, task performance. Role conflict influences team results by reducing the level of team communication. But when role conflict is at a low level, it can to some extent improve team outcomes. The article gives practical advices that teams with members with multiple team membership need to balance advantages like knowledge sharing, team learning improvement, assessment to external resources and disadvantages like role conflict brought by multiple team membership. These teams should maintain role conflict at a reasonable level to avoid its negative influence on team performance and job satisfaction.
文章引用:庄乐, 沈蕾. 角色冲突对团队结果作用的实证研究—团队沟通水平的中介作用[J]. 现代管理, 2017, 7(1): 26-35. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2017.71005

参考文献

[1] Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M. and Watson-Manheim, M.B. (2005) How Virtual Are We? Measuring Virtuality and Understanding Its Impact in a Global Organization. Information Systems Journal, 15, 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x
[2] O’Leary, M.B., Mortensen, M. and Woolley, A.W. (2011) Multiple Team Membership: A Theoretical Model of Its Effects on Productivity and Learning for Individuals and Teams. Academy of Management Review, 36, 461-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0275
[3] Zika-Viktorsson, A., Sundström, P. and Engwall, M. (2006) Project Overload: An Exploratory Study of Work and Management in Multi-Project Settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.010
[4] Erera-Weatherley, P.I. (1996) Coping with Stress: Public Welfare Supervisors Doing Their Best. Human Relations, 49, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900202
[5] Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P. and Snoek, J.D. (1964) Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Wiley, New York.
[6] Killian, L.M. (1952) The Significance of Multiple-Group Membership in Disaster. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1086/220965
[7] O’Leary, M.B., Woolley, A.W. and Mortensen, M. (2011) Multiteam Membership in Relation to Multiteam Systems. Routledge, New York, 141-172.
[8] Zika-Viktorssona, A. and Engwallc, M. (2006) Project Overload: An Exploratory Study of Work and Management in Multi-Project Settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.010
[9] Edmondson, A.C. and Nembhard, I.M. (2009) Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits. Development and Learning in Organizations, 26, 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x
[10] Maynard, M.T., Mathieu, J.E., Rapp, T.L., et al. (2012) Something(s) Old and Something(s) New: Modeling Drivers of Global Virtual Team Effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1772
[11] Cummings, J.N. and Haas, M.R. (2012) So Many Teams, So Little Time: Time Allocation Matters in Geographically Dispersed Teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 316-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.777
[12] Schmidt, A.M. and Dolis, C.M. (2009) Something’s Got to Give: The Effects of Dual-Goal Difficulty, Goal Progress, and Expectancies on Resource Allocation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014945
[13] Karau, S.J. and Kelly, J.R. (1992) The Effects of Time Scarcity and Time Abundance on Group Performance Quality and Interaction Process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90045-L
[14] Parks, C.D. and Cowlin, R. (1995) Group Discussion as Affected by Number of Alternatives and by A Time Limit. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62, 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1049
[15] Altmann, E.M. and Gray, W.D. (2008) An Integrated Model of Cognitive Control in Task Switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602
[16] Leroy, S. (2009) Why Is It So Hard to Do My Work? The Challenge of Attention Residue When Switching between Work Tasks. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 109, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002
[17] Clark, K.B. and Wheelwright, S.C. (1992) Organizing and Leading “Heavyweight” Development Teams. California Management Review, 34, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41167421
[18] Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J. and Higgs, A.C. (1993) Relations between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
[19] O’Leary, M.B. and Cummings, J.N. (2007) The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 31, 433-452.
[20] 姚振华, 孙海法. 高管团队组成特征与行为整合关系研究. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(1): 15-22.
[21] Peterson, M.F., Smith, P.B., Akande, A., et al. (1995) Role Conflict, Ambiguity, and Overload: A 21-Nation Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 429-452. https://doi.org/10.2307/256687
[22] Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J. and Higgs, A.C. (1993) Relations between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
[23] 薛晓芳, 王月, 刘修权, 王玉超. 建筑业与制造业企业组织沟通有效性的比较研究. 工程管理学报, 2012(2): 114-118.
[24] Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., et al. (1983) Assessing Organizational Change a Guide to Methods Measures & Practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 649-651.
[25] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 2005, 37(2): 268-274.