台湾新兴产业转型战略与实践—运用企业架构方法
A Strategic Thinking and Realization on Taiwan Emerging Industries Transformation—Applying Enterprise Architecture Approach
摘要:
近年来台湾经济发展已面临瓶颈,经济成长率并未能转化为生活果实,整体就业不振,薪资普遍降低,整个社会因此感到景气低迷。如何协助产业在遽变环境下,掌握关键技术,强化产业价值链成员本身营运与财务体质,加速转型,降低其受市场波动所带来冲击,实属目前政府及产业辅导机构等之重要推展课题之一。面对日益严峻国际竞争条件恶化,台湾产业转型已刻不容緩,正推动“制造业服务化、服务业科技化与国际化、传产业特色化”之产业转型大政策,透过彻底转型手段,以突破经济发展困境。欲落实台湾产业转型战略,必须透过一个价值链有效转型共同协作之战略规划过程,以具体实现价值群组经营目标和战略,藉由具有宏观视野,“博而精”之“转型推手”群,从战略规划,产业需求,关键技术,创新制造,到营销服务,建构产业价值创造链。本文综合台湾产业转型关键因子与落实产业转型实践所需,提出“产业发展架构模型”,并阐述如何运用“企业架构”方法,创造产业价值,以达成产业转型目标。
Abstract: Taiwan has identified the six emerging industries to lead the new transformation initiative of in-dustry development. To achieve the success of transformation requires a flexible approach of making the strategies and the implementation to respond the rapid change economy environment. The Enterprise Archi-tecture is a proven management framework, through its rigorous description language, the stakeholders can model the real world challenges into components and their inter-relationship in a hierarchical structural way. This article, applying the Enterprise Architecture methodology, presents: 1) an Industry Development Archi-tecture Reference Model to illustrate how the industrial value chain works closely to create innovative value; 2) a Strategic Thinking Model to help the stakeholders understand the current situation and the feasibility of the business goal; 3) a Requirement Reference Architecture to link product, services, and the participants; and 4) a Technical Reference Architecture to illustrate how to trigger the product enhancement process.
参考文献
[1]
|
俞明德, 徐之强, 陈厚铭, 陈建良, 管中闵, 蔡颖义, 谢明慧.台湾产业发展的规划蓝图——总统府[R]. 台北: 国立台湾大学, 2011.
|
[2]
|
胡貝蒂. 拼转骨、顾出路——三业四化加速产业转型、提升产业竞争力[URL], 2012. http://www.cepd.gov.tw/
|
[3]
|
戴肇洋, 陈秋文, 陈巧青. 中小企业发展现况与辅导策略之研析[Z]. 新北: 财团法人台湾综合研究院, 2009.
|
[4]
|
F. Radeke. Toward understanding enterprise architecture management’s role in strategic change: Antecedents, processes, outcomes. Proceeding of 10th Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, Zürich, 16-18 February 2011: 62.
|
[5]
|
R. B. Bird, E. A. Smith. Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 2005, 46(2): 221- 248.
|
[6]
|
R. Wagter, M. van den Berg, J. Luijpers and M. van Steenbergen. Dynamic enterprise architecture: How to make it work. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.
|
[7]
|
沈举三. “全国”产业发展会议预备会议[R]. 台北: 经济部, 2012.
|
[8]
|
经济部. 年度施政目标与重点[R]. 台北: 经济部, 2013.
|
[9]
|
R. Andrews, G. A. Boyne, J. Law and R. M. Walker. Strategy implementation and public service performance. Administration & Society, 2011, 43(6): 643-671.
|
[10]
|
蔡展维, 涂瑞骐, 刘佩玲. 以策略故事观点探讨企业策略变化之研究[A]. 第14届科际整合管理研讨会[C]. 台北: 东吴大学, 2011: 484-499.
|
[11]
|
C. P. Lyford, D. J. Ricks, H. C. Peterson and J. A. Sterns. A framework for effective industry strategic planning. Journal of Agribusiness, 2002, 20(2): 131-146.
|
[12]
|
T. K. Chan, P. T. Hiap. A balanced scorecard approach to measuring industry performance. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 2012, 1: 23-41.
|
[13]
|
N. Melville, K. L. Kraemer and V. Gurbaxani. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 2004: 283-322.
|
[14]
|
R. Hilliard. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010, 2012.
http://www.iso-architecture.org/ieee-1471/index.html
|
[15]
|
N. Bouck’e, A. Garcia and T. Holvoet. Composing structural views in xADL. Early Aspects: Current Challenges and Future Directions, 2007, 4765: 115-138.
|
[16]
|
D. Silingas, R. Butleris. Towards customizing UML tools for enterprise architecture modeling. Information Systems, 2009: 25-27.
|
[17]
|
邹篪生, 孙智丽, 李宜映. 由各国科技前瞻执行经验提出我国农业科技前瞻发展规划[J]. 台湾经济研究月刊, 2009, 32 (12): 48-56.
|
[18]
|
电子化政府现况[Z]. “行政院”研究发展考核委员会, 2007.
|
[19]
|
InfoComm Development Authority of Singapore. Singapore’s e-government development, 2012. http://www.egov.gov.sg/
|