构建中国利率走廊的实证分析
A Modeling and Empirical Test of China Interest Rate Corridor
摘要:
选择银行间质押式回购利率为货币市场代表性利率,以常备借贷便利为走廊上限做中国利率走廊模拟,结果表明,目前只有隔夜和7天品种的利率走廊效果明显。借助泰勒规则,对隔夜、7天、1个月、3个月、6个月五个期限品种的银行间质押式回购利率进行检验,结果显示,五种期限品种的质押式回购利率都满足泰勒规则。这说明,以质押式回购利率为标志的中国货币市场利率具有较高程度的可预估性;质押式回购利率可以作为中国利率走廊的目标利率;经过进一步持续的跟踪、模拟,可以形成中国利率走廊上限模型,并将之付诸市场实践。
Abstract:
We try to construct China Interest Rate Corridor by selecting the rates of REPO as a representative of China money market rates, and capped by SLF (Standing Lending Facility) rates, unfortunately only 2 (overnight and 7-days) of the 5 rates (plus: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months) have been effectively channeled by the respective corridors. But interestingly, all the 5 rates successfully passed the empirical test under Taylor’s Rule. It demonstrates that, under Taylor’s Rule, the REPO rates are to a greater degree predictable. So, it is reasonable to choose some REPO rate/rates as the target rate/rates of interest rate corridors, and it is also probable to further establish corridor cap by modeling, and put them into practice thereafter.
参考文献
[1]
|
胡海鸥, 贾德奎. “利率走廊”调控的理论与实践——货币政策操作的新思路新方法[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2004.
|
[2]
|
中国人民银行营业管理部课题组, 杨国中, 姜再勇, 刘宁. 非线性泰勒规则在中国货币政策操作中的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2009(12): 30-44.
|
[3]
|
戴根有. 中国中央银行公开市场业务操作实践和经验[J]. 金融研究, 2013(1): 55-65.
|
[4]
|
牛慕鸿, 张黎娜, 宋雪涛, 马骏. 利率走廊, 利率稳定性和调控成本[R]. 北京: 中国人民银行研究局, 2015.
|
[5]
|
季伟. 从公开市场操作到利率走廊[J]. 中国金融, 2016(5): 26-27.
|
[6]
|
贾德奎, 胡海鸥. 利率走廊: 我国利率调控模式的未来选择[J]. 财经研究, 2004(9): 56-65.
|
[7]
|
巴曙松, 尚航飞. 利率走廊调控模式的演进、实践及启示[J].经济全球化, 2015(5): 5-10.
|
[8]
|
谢平, 罗雄. 泰勒规则及其在中国货币政策中的检验[J]. 经济研究, 2002(3): 3-12, 92.
|
[9]
|
Poole, W. (1968) Commercial Bank Reserve Management in a Stochastic Model: Implications for Monetary Policy. Journal of Finance, 23, 69-791.
|
[10]
|
Taylor, J.B. (1993) Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy.
|
[11]
|
Taylor, J.B. (1999) A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules. In: Taylor, J.B., Ed., Monetary Policy Rules. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
|