文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

Mtaxas, E.K., Condilis, N. and Tzatzadakis, N. (2006) Sternal fracture with or without associated injuries. Assessment of the difference in the diagnosis, management and complications. Eighteen years of experience. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, 77, 379-383.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 胸骨骨折治疗方法的临床研究The Clinical Study of Treatment for Sternal Fracture

    作者: 何东权, 殷君太, 向家勇, 万志渝, 王兆彬, 张文林

    关键字: 胸骨骨折, 治疗, 方法Sternal Fracture, Treatment, Method

    期刊名称: 《Asian Case Reports in Surgery》, Vol.3 No.2, 2014-06-27

    摘要: 目的:探讨胸骨骨折的外科治疗方法。方法:回顾分析我院于2000年1月至2014年4月收治的35例胸骨骨折,将33例手术治疗的胸骨骨折分为3组:钢丝固定组(包括钢子加钢丝固定)、钢板固定组和记忆合金固定组(镍钛记忆合金胸骨环抱固定),比较其手术时间、术中出血、术后疼痛时间,并比较其术后并发症。结果:记忆合金固定组手术时间为31 ± 7.6 min,明显少于钢丝固定组(52 ± 5.4 min)和钢板固定组(74 ± 5.1 min),P Objective: To compare the efficacies of treatment for sternal fracture with steel wire, steel plate, and memory alloy. Methods: 35 cases with sternal fracture surgical treated from Jan. 2000 to April 2014 were followed up. Among them, 15 cases were surgical treated with memory alloy, 8 cases were surgical treated with steel plate, 10 cases were surgical treated with steel wire. The condi- tions before, during and after operation and complications were compared. Result: The operation time of memory alloy group was 31 ± 7.6 min, less than steel plate group (74 ± 5.1 min) and steel wire group (52 ± 5.4 min), P

在线客服:
对外合作:
联系方式:400-6379-560
投诉建议:feedback@hanspub.org
客服号

人工客服,优惠资讯,稿件咨询
公众号

科技前沿与学术知识分享