干湿循环下岩石力学特性与能量演化规律的实验研究
Experimental Research on the Mechanical Properties and Energy Evolution of Rock under Dry-Wet Cycle
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2020.82013, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 胡 瑾, 牛一新, 张志镇*:中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院,深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州
关键词: 干湿循环花岗岩能量演化力学特性Dry-Wet Cycle Granite Energy Evolution Mechanical Property
摘要: 矿井地下水库、水力发电、基础工程、海绵城市建设等均会遭遇到岩石干湿循环环境,而干湿循环过程对岩石有劣化作用,因此研究干湿循环后岩石的能量演化规律及其关联机制,对于干湿循环下岩石变形破裂现象的深度理解、岩石工程施工与防护的科学决策等具有重要的科学和工程意义。本文选取花岗岩为主要研究对象,对试样分别经过0 (未干湿循环处理)、1、3、6、10次干湿循环处理后,开展处理后岩样的单轴压缩和能量演化试验,并结合声发射特征参数研究了干湿循环后花岗岩的相关力学特性。
Abstract: Underground water reservoir, hydroelectric power generation, basic engineering, sponge city construction, etc. will encounter the dry and wet cycling environment of rock. However, the process of dry wet cycle can degrade the rock. Therefore, it is of great scientific and engineering significance to study the law of energy evolution and its correlation mechanism of rock under the dry wet cycle for the deep understanding of rock deformation and fracture phenomenon under the dry wet cycle and the scientific decision-making of rock engineering construction and protection. In this paper, granite is selected as the research object. After 0 (without dry and wet cycle treatment), 1, 3, 6 and 10 times of dry and wet cycle, the uniaxial compression and energy evolution tests of rock samples after treatment are carried out, and the mechanical properties of granite after wet dry cycle are summarized combining with the characteristic parameters of acoustic emission.
文章引用:胡瑾, 牛一新, 张志镇. 干湿循环下岩石力学特性与能量演化规律的实验研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2020, 8(2): 84-98. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2020.82013

参考文献

[1] 陶振宇. 岩石力学的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 水利出版社, 1981.
[2] 董学晟. 水工岩石力学[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2004.
[3] 刘新荣, 傅晏, 郑颖人, 等. 水岩相互作用对岩石劣化的影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2012, 1(8): 77-82.
[4] 王伟, 刘桃根, 吕军, 王如宾, 徐卫亚, 翦波. 水岩化学作用对砂岩力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(S2): 3607-3617.
[5] 傅晏, 刘新荣, 张永兴, 胡元鑫, 谢应坤. 水岩相互作用对砂岩单轴强度的影响研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2009, 36(6): 54-58.
[6] 邓华锋, 胡安龙, 李建林, 张小景, 胡玉, 常德龙, 朱敏. 水岩作用下砂岩劣化损伤统计本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(3): 631-639.
[7] 王伟, 龚传根, 朱鹏辉, 朱其志, 徐卫亚. 大理岩干湿循环力学特性试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2017, 48(10): 1175-1184.
[8] 曾志雄, 孔令伟, 田海, 李聚昭. 膨胀岩崩解特性的干湿循环效应与粒度熵表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(7): 1983-1989.
[9] 李亚, 余宏明, 李科, 李雄峰. 干湿循环作用下石膏岩劣化效应的试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(3): 63-66.
[10] 梁冰, 谭晓引, 姜利国, 焦波波. 冻–融及干–湿循环对泥质岩崩解特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(4): 705-711.
[11] Badger, C.W., Cummings, A.D. and Whitmore, R.L. (1956) The Disintegration of Shale. Journal of the Institute of Fuel, 29, 417-423.
[12] Prick, A. (1995) Dilatometrical Behaviour of Porous Calcareous Rock Samples Subjected to Freeze Thaw Cycles. Catena, 25, 7-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Ojo, O. (1990) The Effect of Moisture on Some Mechanical Properties of Rock. Mining Science and Technology, 10, 145-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Obert, L., Windes, S.L. and Duvall, W.I. (1946) Standardized Tests for Determining the Physical Properties of Mine Rock. RI-3891, Bureau of Mines, U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
[15] 宣以琼, 武强, 杨本水. 岩石的风化损伤特征与缩小防护煤柱开采机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(11): 1911-1916.
[16] Pardini, G., Guidi, G.V., Pini, R., Regues, D. and Gallart, F. (1996) Structure and Porosity of Smectite Mudrocks as Affected by Experimental Wetting-Drying Cycles and Freezing-Thawing Cycles. Catena, 27, 149-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Gökceoğlu, C., Ulusay, R. and Sönmez, H. (2000) Factors Affecting the Durability of Selected Weak and Clay-Bearing Rocks from Turkey, with Particular Emphasis on the Influence of the Number of Drying and Wetting Cycles. Engineering Geology, 57, 215-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 张志镇, 高峰. 受载岩石能量演化的围压效应研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(1): 1-11.
[19] 张志镇, 高峰. 单轴压缩下岩石能量演化的非线性特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(6): 1198-1207.
[20] 张志镇, 高峰. 单轴压缩下红砂岩能量演化试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(5): 953-962.
[21] 张志镇. 岩石变形破坏过程中的能量演化机制[D]: [博士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2013.